THE Scottish Tories have threatened to table a motion of no confidence in Michael Matheson if he does not hand over the iPad on which he ran up almost £11,000 in roaming charges for investigation.
The Health Secretary insisted on Monday that parliamentary authorities had looked at the data usage on the device, but Holyrood officials said the iPad did not “provide a breakdown of data over a specific timeframe”.
Matheson racked up the £10,935.74 bill during a visit to Morocco over Christmas last year, after he had failed to change over a SIM card in the device.
READ MORE: Calls for Lords reform as David Cameron to dodge Commons grillings
He had initially offered to pay £3000 of the cost, with the Scottish Parliament covering the rest of the bill, but later said he would pay the full amount himself.
And now, Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross has claimed that for Matheson’s claims – that the costs were incurred because of parliamentary and constituency business – to be verified, he must hand over the device to Holyrood IT experts.
The SNP said the move was an attempt to "keep the story going" and insisted Matheson had "done the right thing".
Ross issued an ultimatum to the Health Secretary on Tuesday – that unless he hands over the iPad to be examined and makes a statement to MSPs in Holyrood, then the Scottish Tories will move to force a vote of no confidence.
“We need to get to the bottom of this saga once and for all, so the Scottish Conservatives are issuing the Health Secretary with an ultimatum – hand over the iPad, for the browsing history to be checked, and deliver a personal statement in Parliament explaining the full circumstances, or we’ll table a motion of no confidence,” Ross said in a statement.
On Monday, Matheson accused the Tories of “political mischief” over the issue with the iPad, and insisted it had already been investigated by parliamentary authorities.
Scottish Parliament authorities however said they were “primarily looking at the volume of mobile data consumed” as they had been assured the device was being used for parliamentary purposes.
Ross said this meant Matheson still had “serious questions to answer” over the matter and that “suspicions will linger” until evidence of a breakdown of the costs is provided.
READ MORE: Scotland reacts as David Cameron rejoins Government
“This scandal has dragged on for several days now and Michael Matheson is looking shiftier with each one that passes,” the Scottish Tory leader said.
“He still has serious questions to answer, and suspicions will linger for as long as he fails to prove his claim that the enormous tab he expected taxpayers to foot was the product solely of parliamentary work.”
We previously reported how Matheson insisted authorities had already investigated.
“They investigated the issue back in January,” he said.
“They had all the data and everything from it. They had access to all of the data on the iPad when they looked at it back in January.”
An SNP spokesperson said: "This is simply an attempt to keep a story going, days after Mr Mathieson has done the right thing and agreed to foot the bill personally.
"While we are focused on crucial issues such as steering our health service through the winter, the Tories only ever want to talk about process issues."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel