A “DEAD duck” Tory pro-Union lobby group led by Andrew Bowie has been closed down after just two years of operation.
The Conservative Union Research Unit Ltd (CURU) was established on June 14, 2021 and listed the MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine as one of the unpaid directors.
The group was set up to “provide research and briefings to Members on topics related to strengthening the Union of the United Kingdom”, according to Bowie’s register of interests, and claimed to have around 80 backbench MPs as members.
But official documents show the group has applied for a voluntary strike-off on Companies House on September 19 this year, at the request of its directors. It follows a notice of compulsory strike-off filed on September 5.
READ MORE: SNP MP: 'Ridiculous' pomp of King's Speech must be toned down
The group's confirmation statement, to verify the information held by Companies House is correct, is also listed as overdue and should have been filed by June 27 of this year.
Bowie, minister for nuclear and networks, was one of the three Tory MPs named as director of the group, alongside Robin Millar (below), Welsh Tory MP for Aberconwy and Gareth Bacon, Tory MP for Orpington.
The notice confirming the company is being closed down reads: “The Registrar of Companies gives notice that, unless cause is shown to the contrary, the Company will be struck off the register and dissolved now less than two months from the date shown above.
“Upon the Company’s dissolution, all property and rights vested in, or held in trust for, the Company are deemed to be bona vacantia, and will belong to the Crown.”
Pete Wishart, the SNP’s longest-serving MP, described the lobbying group as a “complete dead duck”.
“It’s a dud of an outfit,” he said.
“Other than Robin Millar’s initial work on this, I haven’t heard anything that they’ve done.
READ MORE: Gaza: Why the Scottish Parliament must back a ceasefire
"It follows a succession of failed initiatives from the Union Unit to the Cabinet committee on the Union in an attempt to try and interest people in Westminster about strengthening the Union.
“The one and only priority when it comes to Scotland is to constrain the Scottish Parliament to bypass it in any way it can, it’s probably not necessary for any sort of campaigning unit to do that because that’s exactly what the Scotland Office does to Scotland all the time.”
Wishart added that the group clearly wasn’t “doing its job” if it failed to interest those in Westminster, which is dominated by Unionist parties and MPs.
“It’s done very little to interest or excite Members of Parliament’s agenda,” he said.
“I’m pretty certain that no one is going to lament its passing.”
A Scottish Greens spokesperson added: “A company founded to make the case for the Union is a company set up for failure.
“This was a group of Conservative MPs who thought they could win Scots over to their side by telling us how successful Brexit has been. But you can’t tell people to deny their own eyes and ears.
"The case for independence gets clearer every time groups like these open their mouths."
The CURU listed only £1700 in assets, with no employees, in its micro accounts for 2022.
The group’s Twitter/X page still appears to be active, with a post relating to gender reforms on October 30 reading: “Is the Labour government in Wales going to make the same error as the SNP government in Holyrood did?”
Millar previously penned an article claiming the group is not a collection of “nostalgic flag-wavers, wandering Westminster humming Rule, Britannia!”
READ MORE: Scottish Muslim charity 'strongly condemns' Douglas Murray comments about Humza Yousaf
The lobby group had intended to emulate the success of the European Research Group (ERG), which took a hardline stance on Brexit policy and helped to remove Theresa May from office as prime minister.
An article on Conservative Home claimed that the group would try to persuade ministers to broaden their arguments against granting a second independence referendum, and would be more constructive in their support for then-prime minister Boris Johnson, than the ERG had been with May.
The Conservative Party declined to comment as they said the group had nothing to do with the party.
Bowie and Millar did not respond to our request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel