EFFORTS to force a vote on whether to call for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas are expected to intensify this week as the Westminster Parliament returns for the King’s Speech.
Left-wing Labour MPs are understood to be discussing methods of doing so with the SNP.
The National understands the SNP are due an opposition day debate next week – though this could be delayed.
If an opposition day debate is secured, it would mean forcing a vote on the issue, which could pose a challenge for Keir Starmer by showing the strength of feeling on the conflict within his party.
The Labour leader is at odds with roughly a third of his MPs who have publicly come out in favour of a ceasefire, whereas he has rejected the idea while Hamas still holds Israelis hostage.
MPs who want a vote on a ceasefire have a number of options for doing so but as yet it is uncertain amongst Westminster politicians how best to pursue one.
It is thought the first port of call would be to rely on the SNP’s expected opposition day debate.
As Labour MPs in favour of a ceasefire are at odds with the party leadership, they must rely on working with the SNP to have their say in a vote.
Opposition day debates give non-Government parties the chance to set the topics of debate.
Votes taken on opposition motions are usually non-binding – meaning the UK Government does not need to respond to or abide by their results.
READ MORE: David Lammy slammed for 'reprehensible' comments on Gaza refugee camp bombing
However it is not guaranteed the SNP will have an opposition day debate next week and MPs may have to seek another way of forcing a vote.
Their other option would be to force a vote through an amendment to the House of Commons’ response to the King’s Speech.
The official opposition usually gets a day for its amendment to be debated and up to three further amendments can be selected for debate and a vote by the Speaker.
This means a vote could be possible, though it would not be certain, unlike the opposition day route.
Another route said to be under consideration is an emergency debate, which brings yet more hoops through which MPs must jump.
An MP wishing to start an emergency debate must apply to the Speaker (above) for permission to make a short speech requesting a debate. MPs then decide if that goes ahead. If it does, it will usually take place the next sitting day.
It also must satisfy three tests to prove that the matter to be debated is:
-
Urgent – requiring an answer from the UK Government with no other option for it to be brought before the House in time by other means
-
Important – meaning the matter must be of evident national importance
-
Specific – meaning the matter must be closely defined and not an opportunity to cover a large number of other concerns
A Labour source told The National efforts to force a vote on calls for a ceasefire had “grown legs” and those hoping to keep the pressure on the UK Government on the issue were hoping the return of MPs after prorogation would facilitate conversations across party lines as to how to go about this.
An SNP MP confirmed they and colleagues had been in conversation with Labour MPs about ways to force a vote on a ceasefire.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf blasts Keir Starmer's 'lack of moral courage' after Gaza speech
It comes at a time of increasingly fraught tensions within Labour over the war between Israel and Hamas.
Many in Labour were furious with Starmer after he said Israel had the right to cut off supplies of water and electricity to Gaza in response to Hamas attacks.
The clip of the interview went viral and the Labour leader has attempted to backtrack on his comments, claiming he had been answering another question.
But many within his party view him as ignoring what they argue are war crimes committed by Israel and he faced calls last week from two Labour council leaders to step down.
One of them, Afrasiab Anwar, who is the leader of Burnley Council in Lancashire, quit Labour on Monday saying his membership was “untenable”.
He accused Starmer of showing he “does not value the voice of the grassroots of the party”.
Another 10 councillors stepped down and the party also recently lost its majority in Oxford City Council after councillors resigned over the issue.
Others are concerned the party may lose the Muslim vote in England, a major part of its constituency in urban areas south of the Border.
Starmer has also found himself at odds with other senior Labour figures, including Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, Mayor of London Sadiq Khan and Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham who have called for a ceasefire.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel