MORE than half of Scots think the UK Government should be doing more to support the whisky industry, according to new polling.
Some 55% of people said that the Tory government was not doing enough in response to a Survation poll for the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA).
The survey also found that almost two-thirds of Scottish adults (63%) would support a freeze to excise duty on Scotch whisky in Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s autumn statement on November 22.
A 10.1% duty increase for whisky was brought in by the UK Government on August 1, in a move that the SWA said took “the tax burden on the average priced bottle to 75%”.
Further results in the Savanta poll of 1064 Scots, conducted between October 9 and 13, found that nearly nine in ten (86%) believe the whisky industry is important to the Scottish economy.
READ MORE: PM insists alcohol duty changes will benefit businesses despite tax hikes
More than nine in ten Scots (92%) also believe the Scotch industry is important to tourism and hospitality (91%).
Mark Kent, the chief executive of the SWA, said: “Scots recognise the contribution Scotch whisky distilleries make to the economy, whether through hospitality, tourism and exports. These are crucial businesses for local economies and merit the type of support Scots want to see the Chancellor provide in his autumn statement.
“Distillers and the businesses they support have already felt the impact of the double-digit duty hike this year – which the ONS said saw alcohol make the biggest contribution to UK inflation on record.
“The Chancellor should back our industry and help deliver on his commitment to halve inflation by ruling out any further excise duty increase in his autumn statement.”
A HM Treasury spokesperson said: "Scotch has received nine cuts or freezes at the last 10 budgets.
"We have also acted to remove punitive tariffs on Scotch whisky imposed on the US market and are committed to protecting the interests of Scotch whisky in trading agreements, ensuring that they face lower tariffs for export, and that the unique characteristics and global reputation of Scotch is protected."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel