KEIR Starmer has been slammed for failing to bring up Gaza once at PMQs on Wednesday afternoon.
Instead, the Labour leader challenged Rishi Sunak on a Conservative by-election candidate who had told jobless parents who could not feed their children to “f*** off”.
Writing on Twitter/X, SNP MP Pete Wishart said: “Not one mention of Israel/Gaza from the be-knighted one. Imagine a Labour leader of the opposition running away from something as all-consuming as that.”
Elsewhere, MP Gavin Newlands also reacted with outrage, saying: “Dearie me. Yes, he’s made a mess on dealing with the #Gaza issue, and yes, his incredible line that he was answering a different question has made things more difficult, but for Sir Keir to run away from this critical issue and not use any of his six #PMQs on it is just cowardice.”
READ MORE: Labour peer's correspondence with UK Government blocked from release
Mhairi Black, who was standing in for Stephen Flynn at PMQs, told the PM a ceasefire could be the “only way” to prevent the conflict from engulfing the Middle East.
Sunak was warned failing to call for this risked “pouring petrol on a fire in a place that only requires a spark to ignite”.
Meanwhile, writing on Twitter/X, Flynn said: "Starmer shying away from even mentioning the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
"Six questions and not a word. No condemnation of collective punishment and no calls for a ceasefire. Cowardice."
It comes amid reports Starmer has arranged a meeting with Labour Muslim MPs as he continues efforts to allay a growing backlash over his position on Israel and Gaza.
READ MORE: Ell Folan: Humza Yousaf's stance on war is in tune with Scots
The Labour leader recently acknowledged he had caused “distress” with remarks made to LBC where he suggested Israel has the “right” to cut off power and water from Gaza.
He clarified his position arguing that he did not mean to back the siege on more than two million Palestinians.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel