LABOUR council chiefs reportedly blocked a bid from one of their own to prevent the mass closure of sports and leisure centres in North Lanarkshire.
Despite growing backlash from within and without the party, a motion to prevent the cuts was ruled out of order according to The Daily Record.
North Lanarkshire Council on Thursday found itself the subject of intense anger as plans were approved to close 39 libraries, leisure centres, pools and other sports and culture facilities.
READ MORE: Labour councillor slams party over facility closures in North Lanarkshire
However, in an attempt to avoid the anger, Labour councillor Heather Brannan-McVey tabled a motion calling for the cuts to be reconsidered because of a “material change in circumstances” at her party’s group meeting last week.
It read: “North Lanarkshire Labour Group recognises that in excess of £25 million addition windfall monies are set to come to North Lanarkshire from the Strathclyde Pension Fund realignment over the next two years, with a likely recurring sum of circa £3 million from 2026 onwards.
“Recognises that this changes the current financial outlook and represents a material change in circumstances.”
READ MORE: North Lanarkshire sports clubs to protest against closures
It went on to call for a delay to the cuts until more facts are known about the pension cash. But a source told The Daily Record that the motion never made a vote.
Meanwhile, Labour has blamed the Scottish Government for the cuts and for under-funding councils.
In response to the go-ahead of closures, affected sports clubs are hosting a demonstration in Motherwell on October 18.
Bellshill Athletic FC, which trains at the Sir Matt Busby Sports Centre, shared the information for the protest online, stating: “In our current climate of so much uncertainty, there local hubs have been instrumental for a lot of people, by maintain their physical and mental health by attending these buildings for their sports and social clubs.
“We believe that solidary amongst clubs can show how much these facilities mean to us and our towns.
“We will join other clubs and encourage everyone to attend as we meet outside the Motherwell Civil on October 18 at 12pm midday.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel