A TRADE association is facing criticism for highlighting the opinion of one B&B owner who compared the Scottish Government’s short-term let licencing scheme to the Highland Clearances.
The Scottish B&B Association has been calling for ministers to delay the implementation of the scheme, which will require landlords of short-term lets to display energy performance ratings on their listings, have adequate buildings insurance, and conform to fire and gas safety precautions.
It is due to go live on October 1 after already being delayed by six months.
However, some in the industry claim the scheme will decimate Scotland’s tourism industry, with many owners thus far failing to apply for a licence.
READ MORE: Station Hotel fire Ayr: Two teens arrested in connection with incident
Yet just weeks after one anti-STL campaigner was fiercely criticised for comparing the scheme to a “pogrom”, the Scottish B&B Association posted a comment from a B&B owner on X/Twitter which compared the scheme to the Highland Clearances.
It stated: “We unfortunately will not be continuing after 1st Oct as a direct result of the draconian requirements demanded now by the Scottish government.
“We liken it to a modern day version of the 1750 Highland Clearances which, in our opinion is going to destroy the unique Scottish hospitality that we have in the Highlands.”
The comment was re-posted by two Conservative MSPs – Edward Mountain and Miles Briggs – after the party forced a vote in Holyrood to delay the legislation, which was subsequently defeated.
READ MORE: UK Government poster claims Dennis the Menace was 'created in London'
Dr Allan Kennedy, a lecturer in Early Modern Scottish History at the University of Dundee, said such comparisons could cloud the reality of historical events and their impacts.
He told The National: "Invoking examples of traumatic historical events like the Highland Clearances can be deeply offensive, threatens to coarsen public discourse, and tends to obscure historical understanding - if we're constantly contorting history to suit contemporary political goals, then it becomes very difficult to talk objectively or accurately about the past.
"At the same time, making spurious comparisons like this is often totally counter-productive, since it makes the person employing them look ridiculous and it therefore becomes far harder to take their wider argument or concerns seriously.
The author and National columnist Gerry Hassan said such comparisons did not help the sector’s cause.
READ MORE: Station Hotel fire Ayr: Two teens arrested in connection with incident
“The age of OTT indignation and inappropriate historical comments,” he said.
“Would be helpful to keep comparisons to ‘Highland Clearances’ out of discussions of the B&B sector. Doesn't help the B&B cause/sector one bit.”
Others on social media suggested the comparison was "offensive" as the Clearances were perpetrated by landlords, not against them.
"Ah yes, the famous anti-landlord Highland Clearances," one user responded. "It’s bugger all like the Highland Clearances," another wrote.
And University of Glasgow historian and author Ewan Gibb said: "In the 1980s, parallels were drawn between the plight of industrial communities facing closure and mass unemployment with the Clearances. Most famously in the Proclaimers anthem, Letter From America.
"Now, it is the landlord class itself which faces the same fate!"
The Scottish B&B Association and the Scottish Conservatives have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel