CANDIDATES for the BBC’s top job will be subject to greater scrutiny in a bid to avoid a repeat of the conflict of interest row which led to the resignation of Richard Sharp.
Sharp left after failing to declare a connection to a £800,000 loan for ex-prime minister Boris Johnson.
The deadline for applications to replace Sharp in the £160,000 a year role passed last Monday.
In an information pack seen by The Observer, candidates are asked to provide not only “interests that might be relevant to the work of the BBC” but also those which “could lead to a real or perceived conflict of interest”.
READ MORE: Grant Shapps clashes with BBC presenter on Laura Kuenssberg show
Candidates are also being asked to “reflect on any public statements you have made, including through social media” and are told there will be “searches of previous public statements and social media (and) blogs”.
Speaking to the newspaper, one source said the guidance puts the “responsibility” firmly on candidates to declare fully anything which might be a conflict of interest.
In Sharp’s (below) resignation statement, he said he had made an “inadvertent” error over a “potential perceived conflict of interest”.
The commissioner’s report into Sharp criticised parts of his appointment process in 2021 but also press leaks that he was ministers’ preferred candidate – which the commissioner said “may well have discouraged people from applying”.
A search firm has reportedly approached leading figures including, it is understood, Snap chair and Channel 4 non-executive director Michael Lynton, BBC acting chair Dame Elan Closs Stephens, former Tory MP and ex-culture minister Lord Vaizey, FA Women’s Super League chair and C4 non-executive Dawn Airey and Arts Council chair and BBC senior independent director Sir Nicholas Serota.
It is not known how many have actually applied for Sharp’s old job with a longlist of candidates to be sifted on October 5 and interviews expected to end on November 10.
READ MORE: Ed Davey labelled 'so weird' for failing to answer Brexit question
The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport said: “The BBC Charter sets out how the chair will be appointed.
“This will be a fair and open process run in accordance with the Governance Code for Public Appointments.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here