HEALTHCARE clinics in Scotland are set to see another wave of anti-abortion protests from next week.
Evangelical group 40 Days for Life have scheduled “prayer vigils” for both Glasgow and Edinburgh between September 27 and November 5.
It comes ahead of the buffer zones legislation being introduced to the Scottish Parliament after a majority of MSPs backed the final proposal ahead of the summer recess.
READ MORE: Tory MSP snaps in bizarre FMQs moment over net zero U-turn
Campaigners called for “movement” on the legislation at the news of more anti-abortion protests set for Scottish healthcare sites.
Scottish Greens MSP Gillian Mackay said that she will give an update on the incoming Safe Access Zones (Scotland) Bill “shortly” after criticism.
The group 40 Days for Life are renowned for targeting women trying to access abortion care in Scotland and beyond, and have been criticised for harassment and their intimidating tactics.
They have been known to hold placards with graphic images of foetuses, approach women trying to use the services, and in England were even found to have forced models of foetuses into the hands of women attending healthcare clinics.
In Glasgow, they target the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) or the Sandyford sexual health clinic, while in Edinburgh protests are planned for the Chalmers Sexual Health Centre.
Legislation to introduce buffer zones has now been passed in Northern Ireland, after a Supreme Court legal challenge, and in England.
40 Days for Life usually holds protests during Lent, with the first demonstration of its kind held outside of the QEUH in January 2016.
The largest anti-abortion gathering on record in the UK took place outside of the QEUH in 2018, where around 200 people from 40 Days targeted the Maternity Wing.
Campaigners Back Off Scotland said: "Forgive us for sounding like a broken record, but we're committed to ensuring people across Scotland never have to face intimidation, harassment or judgement when getting abortions.
READ MORE: FMQs: Shona Robison slams Douglas Ross over 'shouting her down'
“This extends to anyone accessing healthcare, sexual health facilities, or even their workplace. It's abhorrent that a person's decision about their own body should be open to face-to-face opposition from people who do not know them and have no right weighing in on a medical decision that does not concern them.
"We're sick of being stuck where we are - we need movement from Scottish Government to prevent more people [being] made to face this kind of stuff for accessing healthcare.
"Scotland has paved the way in so many aspects of healthcare and social progress. Where's the action here?"
In response, Mackay (below) said: "These protests are an act of intimidation and harassment. They are absolutely wrong and they have no place in a modern and progressive Scotland.
“The organisers know the impact that they are having on health workers and people accessing healthcare but have continued regardless.
"My Members Bill for safe access zones is making strong progress and I look forward to being able to give everyone a full update shortly. It has received a huge level of cross-party support and the backing of the Scottish Government. I am confident that our Parliament will pass it in the months ahead.
"Throughout the process, I have spoken to people who have shared really personal and harrowing stories. My heart and my solidarity is with everyone who has been targeted and who will be in the weeks ahead.
"I am determined that we end these protests for good and that nobody else has to walk through a gauntlet of campaigners and placards just to access the healthcare that they are entitled to.
READ MORE: Young Scots react to Tory net-zero U-turn: 'Blood on their hands'
"We will end those protests for good and protect and expand reproductive rights in Scotland."
Buffer zones would introduce 150-metre zones outside of health facilities so women can access these services without fear and intimidation.
Not all health boards provide abortion services, so the legislation would only implement these no-go areas around clinics and hospitals which provide terminations.
Mackay’s member’s bill was supported by all Scottish party leaders in Holyrood before recess, except for Douglas Ross.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel