WESTMINSTER is still adjusting to devolution in Scotland 25 years on from the re-convening of the Scottish Parliament, according to a review of the UK’s constitution.
The Institute for Government think tank undertook an 18-month review of the constitution, taking advice from former supreme court judge Baroness Hale as well as former UK Government ministers Robert Buckland and David Lidington.
It concluded that a new parliamentary committee dedicated to the constitution should be set up alongside measures which would strengthen the civil service.
However, the report – co-authored with Cambridge University’s Bennett Institute for Public Policy – also claimed that the apparatus of the UK Government was still “adjusting” to devolution.
It read: “25 years on [from devolution] Westminster and Whitehall are still adjusting to the realities of devolution to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.”
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn challenges Anas Sarwar to 'come clean' on triple lock
The report makes a number of recommendations of how the UK could reach a more agreeable constitutional climate.
“The UK is facing a crisis in trust in politics and political institutions,” it said.
“Recent political instability has undermined the UK’s reputation as a stable democracy, damaging its international reputation and, as a consequence, its economic prospects.”
Its authors want to see the UK Parliament undertake more scrutiny on constitutional bills, as well as the establishment of a standing committee which would give an independent view.
They say there should be an independent Office for the Constitution to support this committee, as well as a clarified and strengthened role for the civil service to give constitutional advice.
The report notes that responsibility for constitutional matters has shifted between several different government departments in recent years.
READ MORE: Tory MSP hits out at 'SNP wokery' at cost of totem pole return
It is currently split across the Cabinet Office, the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, and the Ministry of Justice.
The Institute for Government said its proposals would strengthen the system of checks and balances on government power which the UK constitution relies on.
Director Hannah White said: “Some governments enter office with a manifesto commitment to constitutional change, others find the temptation to tinker with the constitution comes upon them.
“Our recommendations are intended to ensure that any politician considering changing the UK constitution is supported with robust advice, and to ensure that the UK constitution is changed only with appropriate consideration and public support.”
READ MORE: Scottish Greens MSP 'corrects' reporter twice during BBC interview
Baroness Hale also commented on the report, describing it as a “timely, sensible and practicable set of proposals for constitutional reform which, though modest, would make real improvement in the way we are governed”.
It comes after the UK Government made interventions into devolved legislation passed by the Scottish Parliament on both gender recognition reform and the deposit return recycling scheme.
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: “The Government takes seriously its constitutional role and responsibility for upholding our unique constitutional settlement.
“We already have two parliamentary committees which are responsible for scrutinising constitutional policy and holding the Government accountable on these issues.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel