CHILD serial killer Lucy Letby has formally lodged a bid to challenge her conviction at the Court of Appeal, officials have confirmed.
Court staff said on Friday, September 15, that they had received an application for permission to appeal.
Letby, 33, originally from Hereford, was sentenced to a whole life order after jurors convicted her of the murders of seven babies and the attempted murders of six others at the Countess of Chester Hospital’s neonatal unit in 2015 and 2016.
The Department of Health has previously said that an independent inquiry will be held into Letby’s case, and will examine “the circumstances surrounding the deaths and incidents – including how concerns raised by clinicians were dealt with”.
READ MORE: Fife: Pedestrian, 46, killed in hit-and-run
Lady Justice Thirwall will lead that inquiry, which will have legal powers to compel witnesses, including former and current staff of the Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, where Letby worked and killed, to provide evidence.
Separately, a court hearing is to take place on Monday, September 25 at Manchester Crown Court, where the Crown Prosecution Service will announce if a retrial is to be held on a total of six counts on attempted murder charges where jurors failed to reach a verdict.
The jury in the first trial, which lasted 10 months, was unable to reach verdicts on six counts of attempted murder of babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital.
The six counts were one for Child H, one for Child J, one for Child K, two for Child N and one for Child Q, with the prosecution alleging these attacks by Letby, a neonatal unit nurse, took place between September 2015 and June 2016. Letby, 33 and originally from Hereford, denied all charges.
CPS guidance in the event of the failure of a jury to agree on a verdict is, as stated on its website: "There is a presumption that the prosecution will seek a retrial where a jury fails to agree on a verdict at the first trial.
"The following factors should be taken into account when considering a retrial in these circumstances.
- The merits of the case;
- Likely reasons for the jury's failure to reach a verdict;
- The public interest in seeking a verdict
- The interests and views of the victim(s);
- Any views expressed by the trial judge;
- Prosecuting Advocate's opinion; and
- The views of the police.
"Where two juries fail to reach a verdict, the presumption is that the prosecution will not seek a third trial unless there are exceptional circumstances."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article