SCOTTISH Labour MSPs have come under fire for not backing a motion calling out the UK Government’s approach to child poverty.
SNP MSP Bob Doris lodged a motion in the Scottish Parliament entitled “Tackling Child Poverty” which called out harmful Tory policies such as the two-child limit and benefit cap.
The motion - debated on Tuesday evening - insisted the two-child cap causes “disproportionate harm” to low-income families and women survivors of domestic abuse or sexual assault, and called on the UK Government to introduce an equivalent to the Scottish Child Payment.
But Doris has called out Labour MSPs after none of them offered their support, despite the likes of Monica Lennon and Mercedes Villalba previously condemning leader Keir Starmer’s U-turn on ditching the two-child cap.
READ MORE: Yes would progress if Humza Yousaf articulated UK's economic reality
He said on Twitter/X: “Incredibly disappointing no Labour Party MSP signed my motion (debated this evening) condemning the UK Conservative Government benefit cap, two-child limit and associated rape clause.
“It has impacted on almost 4000 children in Glasgow and pushed 20,000 across Scotland into poverty.”
Incredibly disappointing no Labour Party MSP signed my motion (debated this evening) condemning the UK Conservative Government benefit cap, two-child limit & associated rape clause. It has impacted on almost 4,000 children in Glasgow & pushed 20,000 across Scotland.into poverty. https://t.co/8U2Yo1Wxy4 pic.twitter.com/VkDLoSTbHW
— Bob Doris (@BobDorisSNP) September 12, 2023
Starmer originally vowed to scrap the two-child limit but faced a major backlash from within his own party a few months ago when he announced it would no longer part of Labour’s plans if they were to win the General Election next year.
Lennon even urged members to make Starmer change his mind on the matter insisting it was the “wrong position” to keep the cap.
Villalba highlighted that Starmer was elected on a pledge to get rid of the two-child cap, adding that ditching it was what the country needed.
The Labour leader has also been called out for U-turning on introducing a wealth tax in recent weeks and ruling out free school meals for all children in England.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel