NEARLY 400 rural businesses have asked the Scottish Government to re-think plans to licence grouse shooting, claiming the practice will be "disastrous" for private estates and local economies.
Upland estates, farmers, tradespeople and hotels are among those who have written to environment minister Gillian Martin calling for changes to the Wildlife Management and Muirburn (Scotland) Bill.
The Scottish Government is seeking to minimise the environmental damage caused by grouse moors and put an end to the illegal persecution of birds of prey, which have often been found shot or poisoned on estates.
The bill seeks to implement many recommendations of the Werritty review in December 2019, which called for widespread changes to grouse moor management and the regulation of traps in Scotland.
In the letter, businesses raise concerns over the proposed licence duration of only one year, which they said would provide no long-term business certainty and would also create an “administrative burden” for estates and NatureScot.
Ross Ewing, director of moorland at Scottish Land & Estates, said: “If the proposed licensing scheme is introduced without amendments, then it would be disastrous – not only for moorland estates but also for the broad range of businesses and communities that rely on them across rural Scotland.
“Scottish Government-commissioned research has shown that, compared to other upland land uses, grouse shooting provides the greatest number of jobs per hectare, the highest levels of local and regional spending, and the greatest levels of investment per hectare without public subsidy.
“The Scottish Government will jeopardise this if it does not bring forward amendments that will provide certainty to businesses and legal safeguards for licence holders.
READ MORE: Rory Stewart says he has 'often' considered standing to be an MSP
“We believe that by working with us on the suggestions set out in this letter, the Scottish Government will be able to achieve its policy objective without running the risk of fatally damaging a vital rural sector. We very much hope they will be willing to constructively engage.”
The businesses also express concerns over the broad discretionary power of the Government’s nature body NatureScot to decide whether it is “appropriate” to grant a licence, and the power it would have to suspend licences.
Another issue raised in the letter to Martin is the wide range of offences – not just raptor persecution – that could lead to a licence being modified, suspended or revoked.
Businesses say the game and country sports sector is worth more than £350 million per year to the Scottish economy and more than 11,000 full-time jobs are supported by sporting shooting, often in rural areas where alternative sources of employment are scarce.
READ MORE: Sunak bows to pressure and raises case of Jagtar Singh Johal in India
Mike Smith, owner of Tay House which provides sporting accommodation in Dunkeld, Perthshire, said: “Country sports are an integral part of the rural economy and provide businesses like mine with a much-needed boost beyond the conventional summer tourism season.
“To see the Scottish Government playing Russian roulette with rural businesses and livelihoods in this way is frankly unconscionable.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “We recognise the valuable contribution that grouse shooting makes to our rural economy and the Wildlife Management and Muirburn Bill is not about preventing this activity.
“But it is clear that grouse moors must be managed in a sustainable and responsible way that minimises environmental impacts and helps to protect nature and wildlife.
“The provisions in the bill provide for a practical, proportionate and targeted licensing regime which will support those carrying out activities appropriately and in line with the law, and will have consequences for those that don’t.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel