ORGANISERS of the Chain of Freedom have issued an update to grassroot activists taking part in the event on October 14.
It comes as the organisation has been told the group cannot use canal tow paths linking West Dunbartonshire with the Edinburgh for the proposed 77,000 person human chain.
The initial plan was for activists to join across 66 miles of the Forth, Clyde and Union Canal paths linking Scotland’s largest city and its capital.
The group will now be using the Forth and Clyde Canal path ONLY - cutting the route by an estimated 20 miles.
Organisers say that despite being in touch with Scottish Canals since January 2023, the group have only just been “advised that we are forbidden to use the Union Canal” for the event.
On Tuesday night, the group emailed “every person and every group” who had chosen the Union Canal route as their preferred section.
A post updating members on the event’s Facebook page does state the event will still go ahead despite the change of plans.
READ MORE: Scottish independence Chain of Freedom demo plans reach major milestone
Organiser Wilma Bowie wrote: “Regardless of extensive and exhaustive negotiations, Scottish Canals have stated that the ‘Union Canal’ is unfit and unsafe for the public to use, under the Chain of Freedom Scotland’s capacity and volume of supporters, notwithstanding (pardon the pun) being informed that ‘thousands of public uses of the canal on a daily basis’.
An email will be sent to all who have registered to use the Union Canal location in participation of the chain, to either be moved automatically to a new section or choose a new section.
READ MORE: Scottish Government won't get UK cash for Raac concrete problems
Bowie added her apology, writing: “Our hands have literally been tied. We are more than aware, that those who have already made arrangements, may have to change but nothing will ever come easy with our path to an Independent Scotland.
“We overcome and adapt. We will not give up or be discouraged”.
Admins and supporters now have “an added task of transferring and rearranging those already registered” – the group asks for patience while changes are made.
Bowie concludes by noting, “how ironic ~ the ‘Union’ Canal has been closed off to independence supporters”, while one member replied, “to be renamed the Independence Canal in a few short years...?”.
Scottish Canals has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel