LABOUR peer George Foulkes has said he will be “intensifying his campaign to stop illegal spending” by the Scottish Government when recess ends.
The former MSP and MP, who has previously insisted the idea of an equal Union was nothing more than a “myth”, also referred to Scotland’s leadership as an “elected dictatorship”.
Foulkes has argued for years that Holyrood should not be able to spend on matters relating to independence, given constitutional matters are reserved to Westminster.
It comes after we previously reported how the UK Government was investigating Scottish Government spending on a minister for independence.
Foulkes previously appeared to produce an email which seemed to confirm that Advocate General Keith Stewart had ordered his staff to probe spending although sources within the Scotland Office initially denied the existence of this to multiple outlets.
READ MORE: Edinburgh Yes rally is a test for the movement not Humza Yousaf
Following this however, Foulkes then challenged the UK’s top civil servant Simon Case on whether or not such spending was being looked at.
Case said that “civil servants in Scotland and Wales can only spend their money on areas that are within their competence”.
Asked specifically about the work of Jamie Hepburn, he replied: “We are looking at some of these specifics as we speak and doing that with ministers at the moment to see whether we need to issue further guidance and clarification to civil servants about what is and is not appropriate spending.
“I don’t want to prejudice the outcome of that.”
Many took to X, formerly known as Twitter, to criticise Foulkes for his comments.
MSP for Aberdeen Central Kevin Stewart (below) said: “George proving his buffoonery once again by using the phrase ‘elected dictatorship’.
“He will never get over the fact that the people have voted the way that they have and not the way that he wishes.”
Another pointed out that it probably wasn’t the “best idea” for an unelected peer to “stop the elected Scottish Government from doing what it was elected to do”.
These thoughts were echoed by a third user who said Foulkes was using his “unelected privilege to attack your country’s elected Parliament”.
We also previously told how Labour distanced themselves from their peer’s calls for the UK Government to step in and prevent spending on independence.
READ MORE: Edinburgh Yes rally: It’s time to rekindle our belief in Yes
Keir Starmer said he had not seen what was said and so was “not in a position to comment” while Sarwar said it was not the UK Government’s role to “impose” restrictions on Scottish Government spending.
He added he had not seen the “particular comments” Foulkes had made.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “The First Minister has appointed a ministerial team that reflects the priorities that he will pursue in government – including tackling child poverty, improving public services, building a fairer, greener economy, and giving people the information about devolution and independence that they need to make an informed choice about Scotland's constitutional future.
“It is the role of the Civil Service to support the elected government of the day in developing and implementing its policies.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel