TWO animal rights campaigners have admitted trying to stop the Scottish Grand National from taking place by entering the track.
Rose Paterson, 34, from London, and Joshua Parkinson, 27, from Leeds, were among 24 people from the Animal Rising group charged by police after the disruption of the race in Ayr in April.
Lawyer Clare Ryan, representing Paterson and Parkinson, entered guilty pleas on their behalf to a charge of committing a breach of the peace by conducting themselves in a disorderly manner and forming part of a disorderly crowd to overcome security and enter the racetrack.
READ MORE: Brian Cox calls on Scots to speed up push for independence
They admitted entering the track at Ayr Racecourse when a race meeting was in progress equipped with glue, piping and other implements designed to enable people to secure themselves to jumps, fences or railings on April 22.
The pair denied a second charge of trespassing at Ayr Racecourse on the same date, which was accepted by the Crown when the case was called at Ayr Sheriff Court on Wednesday.
Sheriff Siobhan Connelly said the pair, who were excused attendance, will be sentenced next month.
READ MORE: Call to expand Scottish independence citizenship plans
Procedural hearings also took place for a number of others who face the same two charges and were also excused from attendance on Wednesday.
Gemma Barnes, 23, from Norwich, Miranda Courtney, 39, from Leeds, Jamie Carter, 28, from Norwich, Nathan McGovern, 24, from London, Benjamin Stevenson, 23, from London, Zuki Paul, 23, from Reading, Imogen Robertson, 22, from Stirling, Alex Hamil, 55, from Bath, Robert Houston, 44, from London, Jennifer d’Netto, 54, from Malvern Wells, Joshua Lane, 26, from Alfreton, Calum Marshall, 25, from Edinburgh, and Claire Smith, 25, from Leeds, maintained their not guilty pleas through their lawyers and will stand trial next month.
The Scottish Grand National was not delayed and the 18-horse race, which started at 3.38pm, was won by Kitty Light.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article