THE Presiding Officer is set to introduce a time limit for questions during FMQs and other Holyrood business to “enhance scrutiny”.
MSPs will be given 45 seconds to ask questions of the First Minister and other members of the Scottish Government, while they will be given a strict one minute to provide a response.
It comes after FMQs was extended from 30 minutes to 45 minutes during the last term to allow more members to put questions forward, but the PO said the move did not have the “intended effect” and there was still significant demand from MSPs to ask questions.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross offers to back SNP rebels in vote to undo Bute House deal
The change will apply to FMQs, general questions and portfolio questions taken in the Holyrood chamber.
Alison Johnstone informed MSPs of the decision in a letter ahead of the Scottish Parliament reconvening on Monday September 4, with chamber business to kick off on Tuesday September 5.
In a letter to MSPs, Johnstone (below) set out how the cross-party agreement to extend FMQs was brought in to “enable more Members to put questions” to the First Minister.
“This extended period has not had the intended effect and each week there is significant unmet demand from Members across the Chamber to put important questions to the First Minister,” she wrote.
“As Presiding Officer, I take account of the interests of all Members equally and I am determined that the opportunity should be afforded to more Members.
“More concise exchanges throughout will provide time for a substantial number of additional questions over the course of a parliamentary year.”
Johnstone explained that if four or five extra MSPs were allowed to ask supplementary questions during FMQs, an additional 150 to 180 questions would be taken each parliamentary year.
“To achieve this, questions should be put within 45 seconds, and answers concluded within one minute,” she explained.
READ MORE: Ex-Labour MP in damning verdict on Keir Starmer after latest U-turn
“From the start of the new term in September, the Deputy Presiding Officers and I will intervene where required to implement this approach, allowing more Members to put questions on behalf of their constituents and enhancing scrutiny.
“For clarity, this will apply in all question times - FMQs, general questions and portfolio questions.”
The PO said she was grateful for the support of the FM and other party leaders in bringing in the change.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel