FIRST Minister Humza Yousaf has said he “fundamentally disagrees” with recent criticism of proposed reforms to how the legal sector is regulated.
The Regulation of Legal Services (Scotland) Bill was lodged earlier this year and would give ministers powers over the regulation of legal professionals.
Correspondence published by Holyrood’s Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee showed the level of discontent within the sector, with the Senators of the College of Justice saying it would be a “threat” to the independence of the profession and judiciary as well as open up the legal system to “political abuse”.
Critics have also said the Scottish Government would be given the status of “co-regulator” of the profession alongside the Lord President.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf: Gender Bill legal challenge cost to be public after case
Speaking to the PA news agency on Monday, the First Minister said: “I fundamentally disagree.
“In terms of the reforms that we’re bringing forward – remember, these came on the back of a consultation – people want to see the legal profession appropriately regulated.
“We also, as a Government, absolutely respect the independence of the judiciary.
“I was justice secretary for a period of time in the Government, I completely understand the need for independence of the judiciary and, of course, we will consider any ideas, amendments, that are brought forward , but it’s really important that we have a legal profession that is appropriately regulated.”
In its submission to the committee, the Senators of the College of Justice – Scotland’s top judges – said: “These proposals are a threat to the independence of the legal profession and the judiciary.
“It is of critical constitutional importance that there is a legal profession which is willing and able to stand up for the citizen against the government of the day.
“The judiciary is fundamentally opposed to this attempt to bring the legal profession under political control.
“If the bill is passed in its current form, Scotland will be viewed internationally as a country whose legal system is open to political abuse.”
READ MORE: Hope of winning legal challenge over gender reform 'vanishingly small'
The Law Society of Scotland said: “Of greatest concern to us, as we will detail in this submission, is the desire of the Scottish Government to be granted extensive and exceptional new powers of intervention over how legal professionals are regulated.
“These powers, which we have not been able to identify in any other western democracy, risk seriously undermining the rule of the law and the independence of Scotland’s legal sector from the state.
“A key component of a free and democratic society is the role that an independent legal profession plays in challenging government and protecting citizens from the excessive use of power by the state.
“We hope the committee will ultimately conclude these sections should be removed from the Bill altogether.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel