NICOLA Sturgeon is to lose her security detail, which was costing some £600,000 a year, according to reports.
The former first minister, who officially left the job in late March, had security in place amid fears for her safety.
The former first minister has been the target of huge amounts of vitriol and abuse online. In February, a man was found guilty of threatening to kill her after writing a threat on social media.
But Scotland’s top civil servant, permanent secretary John-Paul Marks, and now-former Police Scotland chief constable Iain Livingstone signed off on the cut to the service, according to the Scottish Sun.
The detail was reported to be around six police officers plus vehicles, but it has been scaled back and is this month due to be ended completely.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour and SNP neck and neck as independence support steady in new poll
The SNP and Sturgeon herself did not object to the changes, reports say, but there was “pushback” behind the scenes.
A source told the Sun: “While it didn’t come directly from Sturgeon, there was pushback against the decision – a bit of a row behind the scenes.”
In June, Sturgeon was arrested, questioned, and released without charge as part of Police Scotland's ongoing probe into SNP finances.
Asked about “Operation Branchform” during an appearance at the Edinburgh Fringe earlier in August, she said: “It’s obviously been a really difficult, traumatic experience.
“People live through worse, I’m not going to overstate that. My touchstone I guess in all of it, all along, is I am confident in my own position. I am absolutely certain I have done nothing wrong.”
Sturgeon’s husband Peter Murrell and the SNP’s former treasurer Colin Beattie were also arrested, questioned, and released as part of the probe.
Professor John Curtice said that the incidents have had little effect on the SNP’s health in the polls, pointing instead to the leadership contest as the source of the party’s recent dip in support.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel