ANAS Sarwar has said that “some of the criticisms” labelled at Keir Starmer are “unfair” as he defended the Labour leader’s stance on immigration.
Speaking in an interview with The Herald, the Scottish Labour leader was quizzed on a number of issues from the upcoming Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election to divides with UK Labour.
Asked if Labour “still embraced socialism” under Starmer, Sarwar said that “our broad church is still underpinned by left and left-of-centre politics”.
On immigration, he was asked about the Labour leader’s position on housing migrants on barges.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond’s single Yes candidate plan would be a disaster
Shadow immigration minister Stephen Kinnock has previously said barges and military camps would still be used to temporarily house asylum seekers if Labour wins the next General Election.
Although he said this made him “deeply unhappy”, he added that it was the only way to “deal with the mess we inherit”.
Sarwar said: “He [Starmer] was misrepresented on the barges. He said he wanted no barges, no hotels and no flights to Rwanda.
“Day one might be difficult but on the principal we don’t want them. Some of the criticisms of Keir are unfair.
“The SNP want to pretend this will be a no-change election. But this is a fundamental-change election.
“They’re running their entire election strategy on this because they don’t have a good record to stand on. They know that a UK Labour government is bad for them.
“For the last 16 years they’ve fed off the Tories being in power.”
READ MORE: Michael Matheson offers to help Steve Barclay in junior doctors' talks
A date is yet to be set for the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election, which was triggered following the removal of ex-SNP MP Margaret Ferrier.
The Sunday National previously spoke with the SNP’s candidate Katy Loudon who said that people were picking up on “flip-flopping” from Labour.
On the upcoming by-election, Sarwar said: “We used to be scared of by-elections. Now it’s the SNP turn to be scared of them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel