ANGUS MacNeil has accused the Scottish Government of taking a “high and mighty” approach to controversial fishing restrictions.
A consultation on highly-protected marine areas (HPMAs) closed earlier this year, with the Scottish Government proposing to halt human activity in at least 10% of Scotland waters.
The issue became a polarising one, drawing criticism from rural and fishing communities, opposition politicians, and some within the SNP before the plans were scrapped by the Scottish Government.
Speaking to Times Radio on Sunday, MacNeil – the MP for Na h-Eileanan an Iar who was recently expelled from the SNP – said: “They eventually U-turned, but they U-turned too late after annoying a whole load of people unnecessarily on what was a daft policy.
“It was clearly unsustainable that they were going to run with that. It was a sort of high and mighty attitude.
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie: Fergus Ewing hasn’t come to terms with climate crisis
“Eventually Humza Yousaf saw the tidal wave, if you pardon the pun, coming his way and he climbed down, but he could have climbed down in a better way.
“He could have climbed down when he came in first as First Minister and said ‘this is daft’ and made a virtue of his U-turn rather than make it look like he’d been forced into a U-turn.”
Speaking later on the same radio station, former SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said there had to be some kind of measure in place for conservation of marine life.
“What was taking place was a consultation,” he said.
“When I speak to fishermen in my own constituency, they all recognise we’ve got to have effective management of the seas.
He added: “The fishermen that I speak to and that I represent, are very clear that we need to have something sustainable.
“What we need to do is make sure that those in these communities are being consulted with and this is done properly.
“We’ll find a way through this and there are opportunities to make sure that we are protecting the interests of those that are engaged in fishing, not just for current generations but for generations to come.”
There have been calls in recent weeks for the SNP’s membership to have a fresh say on the Bute House partnership agreement with the Greens, following concerns over policies such as HPMAs.
It is understood discussion of “controversial” green policies could be on the agenda at this year’s SNP conference, which is also expected to include a “proper debate” on independence.
A spokesman for the Scottish Government said: “The Cabinet Secretary set out the government’s position to the Scottish Parliament in June.
“While we remain firmly committed to the outcome of enhanced marine protection, the proposal as consulted on will not be progressed and a full response to the consultation and information on the next steps will be published after summer recess.
“Ministers are continuing to engage with coastal communities.
“The Cabinet Secretary has made clear that she is determined to protect our oceans in a way that is fair, and to find a way forward that ensures our seas remain a source of prosperity for the nation, especially in our remote, coastal and island communities.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel