HUNDREDS of people have signed an open letter calling for the Home Office to review the case of a postgraduate student at the University of Stirling who has been detained.
Muhammad Rauf Waris was arrested and detained by immigration workers after being accused of breaching the conditions of his visa by working more than the legally permitted 20 hours per week.
However, despite saying he has presented evidence to the contrary, he has been held at Dunvegal Immigration Removal Centre for seven weeks.
READ MORE: Glen Coe: Investigation opened into deaths of three hikers
He said he his health has deteriorated since arriving, that he is unable to eat and that his family are “suffering” worrying about him.
The open letter
The open letter explains that Waris believed he was following all legal requirements, attending all his classes and completing all his assignments.
The Court has denied his application for bail, leaving him in Dungavel awaiting a decision on whether the case can be judicially reviewed.
The letter can be accessed and signed HERE.
It reads: “We are becoming increasingly worried about our fellow student, specifically regarding his health and are appalled by the way his case has been handled – despite having provided the Home Office with evidence to support that he was following the conditions of his visa over a month ago, they are yet to review his case.
“The student continues to live in limbo. We urge the Home Office to review his case, properly consider the evidence he has provided, and make a decision on the case promptly – rather than unnecessarily prolonging the deprivation of the student’s liberty which has proven to have detrimental effects on him.
READ MORE: What SNP MPs are saying about Angus MacNeil's expulsion
“We stand in full solidarity and hope to welcome him back in our community at the University of Stirling as soon as possible.”
The letter has been signed by a number of organisations including NUS Scotland, Student Action for Refugees Stirling, Amnesty at University of Stirling and No Evictions Network.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel