THERE are bigger issues than how a first minister travels through an airport, Nicola Sturgeon has said, as she called for “perspective” over recent reporting on Scottish Government credit cards.
Speaking at Iain Dale’s All Talk Edinburgh Fringe Show, the former first minister said the £10,000 spent on VIP airport services over three years were likely much cheaper than “one private jet flight of Rishi Sunak’s”.
The MSP also took a pop at the Scottish press and said she didn’t understand the “outrage” as there were numerous security issues to be taken into consideration.
Sturgeon added that there were bigger issues that could have been reported or investigated, like the UK Government’s spending on PPE contracts.
She said: "The airport stuff, you know, a first minister has the ability to travel through an airport quickly and securely. I don’t know if that is an outrage, you can make up your own mind.
"I think I saw £10,000 over three years, I don’t know what the period was, that’s probably less than one private jet flight of Rishi Sunak’s.
"There's something about Scottish politics, is it uniquely Scottish politics? I don't know.
"But it's particularly the case in Scottish politics just now, there's just something really kind of lacking in perspective about how we're debating and having these things reported.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour criticised for conflating SNP and civil servants
"There’s definitely big issues there that perhaps should be getting more coverage than a first minister’s travel arrangements."
We told how on Tuesday Scottish Labour released data showing that civil servants had spent £14.2 million on credit cards over the course of three years.
Also revealed in the figures was spending on Sturgeon's travel arrangements at airports during her time as first minister.
Over the three years, £9898 was spent on a firm known as Ace Handling, which fast-tracks clients through check-in and security before waiting for their flight in a VIP lounge.
It also emerged that civil servants had charged numerous items, including yoga classes, nail polish and a "homedisco" from eBay.
Asked if the story "exacerbated the idea" on social media that all politicians have got their hand in the public purse, Sturgeon criticised the coverage.
READ MORE: John Curtice gives verdict on reason for SNP's slide in political polls
"That's what it was intended to do, but it doesn't make it true, frankly," Sturgeon blasted.
"If you did a quick Google search I'm sure you would find similar things about the UK Government, perhaps with a bit more justification on some things, but you know there’s lots of issues around in Scotland that would be absolutely legitimate for scrutiny about how public money is spent.
"I’m not denying that that’s the case in Scotland, but maybe a bit more coverage about PPE contracts and the UK Government and things like that.
"These things are important in terms of scrutiny about how the public's money has been spent, but the point is, I think stories like this one actually detract from that because it contributes to a sense that you're missing the real point and focusing on things that are perhaps being presented in a way that doesn't quite match reality."
We told how First Minister Humza Yousaf ordered a review of the spending by civil servants after the claims emerged.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel