DOWNING Street has confirmed that the Justice Secretary was “speaking on behalf of the Government” when he defended Lee Anderson telling migrants to “f*** off back to France”.
Anderson has attracted fierce criticism for his comments, but that has not stopped Downing Street from defending him.
The Tory Party’s deputy chair told the Express that migrants who do not want to stay on the Bibby Stockholm barge should “f*** off back to France”.
The MP was defended by his colleague and Justice Secretary Alex Chalk (below) on LBC, who described the word choice as “salty” but that “his indignation is well placed”.
Since then, Downing Street has told Sky News: “The Justice Secretary was speaking on behalf of the government.”
Anderson has hit back at some of the criticism labelled at him, including from suspended Labour MP Diane Abbott who said the comments were “a new low even for the Tories”.
He tweeted: “Wrong again @HackneyAbbott. I told illegal migrants to go back to France not genuine asylum seekers.
“Btw not seen you in Parliament for a few months. Are you on leave or have you said something daft again?”
Abbott had the whip suspended after she writing a letter in which she suggested Irish, Jewish and Traveller people are not subject to racism “all their lives”.
We previously told how the SNP said that Anderson’s comments proved the Tories “really are the nasty party”.
Their justice and immigration spokesperson Stuart McDonald said: “The way the Tories have dehumanised desperate people is sickening, and proves they really are the nasty party.
READ MORE: Elections watchdog apologies after year-long data hack revealed
“We owe it to those seeking refuge from unimaginable conditions to provide safe shelter.
“Instead, the Tories, now with the support of pro-Brexit Labour, have sought to use human beings as political tools.
“Scotland can and will have an asylum and immigration system that is both fair and humane, but it’s clear we can only do that with the full powers of independence.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel