HUMZA Yousaf would reject his British citizenship and instead choose to take only the citizenship of an independent Scotland.
The First Minister told journalists that would “probably” be his position at a roundtable with the media after the launch of a new white paper dealing with the issue of citizenship after a Yes vote.
The paper says that British citizens living in Scotland on the day of independence would automatically qualify as Scottish citizens and become dual nationals. However, they would also be able to opt out of either one.
People would have the choice to either renounce their British citizenship and become only Scottish citizens, or reject a Scottish citizenship, keeping only their British passport.
Asked if he would retain his British citizenship alongside his new Scottish one, the SNP leader said: “I’ve not thought much about it but I probably wouldn’t, no.”
“I would just have my Scottish citizenship,” he added.
The First Minister also told reporters that people who moved to Scotland from elsewhere in Britain after a Yes vote but before the day of independence would be “welcome”.
British citizens who moved to Scotland during this transition period would automatically become Scottish citizens on the day of independence, and there would be no plans for a citizenship test akin to the one used in the UK.
READ MORE: Labour peer doubles-down on 'UK is not a Union of equals' claim
Yousaf said: “I would welcome them [British citizens who choose to move to Scotland after a Yes vote but before independence].
“We have demographic challenges. We have vacancies in important sectors, public and private I have to say, and we’re already working on trying to attract more people from the UK to Scotland.
“I think we would welcome that in that transition period in the run up to Scotland becoming an independent nation.”
Yousaf pointed to his time as health secretary and a campaign which the government ran trying to attract GPs to Scotland’s rural areas from elsewhere in the UK.
He added that movement over the Border during a transition period, especially by workers in such key sectors, would be welcomed “whole-heartedly”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel