SCOTLAND’S top police officer has defended the use of a blue forensics tent outside Nicola Sturgeon’s home as he suggested that the investigation into SNP finances had "moved beyond" the initial complaint.
Iain Livingstone, who will step down as chief constable of Police Scotland in August, suggested in an interview on BBC Radio 4 that officers were probing potential “embezzlement” or “misuse of funds” in their SNP investigation.
Named Operation Branchform, the probe into SNP finances is looking at how some £600,000 in funds raised to fight a second independence referendum were used.
READ MORE: Police Scotland boss warns of 'ill-informed speculation' over SNP finances probe
Amid the police probe on April 5, former SNP chief executive Peter Murrell was arrested, questioned and released without charge as officers searched both his home address and SNP headquarters.
A blue forensics tent was set up outside Murrell’s home, which he shares with his wife former SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon, in a move that would be questioned as unusual and “over the top”.
But Livingstone defended the use of the tent. “It absolutely was [proportionate] given the circumstances of that search,” he said.
“The tent was there, as well as all the other measures, to protect the interests of justice and to protect the individuals involved. So it was a proportionate and necessary step.”
The Police Scotland boss also told the BBC that the probe into the SNP had “moved beyond what some of the initial reports were”, adding: “That's not uncommon in investigations such as this.”
He said: “Investigations into the finances of an organisation, the finances of an individual, are often complex.
“Investigations around fraud or investigations around potential embezzlement, or investigations around the misuse of funds, take time. You need to go and obtain information from banks and other financial institutions. We can't just do that automatically.
“We need to go and seek judicial warrants for that. There needs to be a process around that. So the time that's been taken, in my judgment, is absolutely necessary.
“There's been a prudent, thorough, and proportionate investigation carried out.”
Livingstone said that if the investigation had been carried out in any other way then his force would have opened itself up to justified criticism.
He told Radio 4: “What I would say is that had we not carried out this investigation in the manner we have, I would rightly have been accused of a significant dereliction and neglect of duty.
READ MORE: Racism, sexism, and misogyny 'a reality in Police Scotland', top officer admits
“That's not the case. We've done the right thing. The rule of law and the interests of justice must prevail.”
Livingstone has been giving media interviews ahead of his retirement, including one to the Sunday Times in June.
He used that platform to warn against uninformed speculation about the SNP probe.
“Stating opinion or speculation without having the knowledge and information that exists is damaging … because it infringes the rights of individuals,” he said.
“Operation Branchform has integrity, it is expected to have rigour. If the operation had not been pursued, I would rightly have been accused of neglect of duty.”
Jo Farrell, who is currently in charge of Durham Constabulary, will take over as the head of Police Scotland after Livingstone's retirement.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article