The SNP have called for a “full, independent inquiry” into whether Scottish Tory MP David Duguid has broken the ministerial code.
It comes following revelations Duguid, who represents Banff and Buchan, criticised the idea of a windfall tax on energy companies without declaring his wife’s shares in BP.
Duguid’s spouse has more than 11,000 shares and would have received more than £2000 last year in dividends.
The former junior minister in the Scotland Office has spoken against windfall taxes on energy giants four times in parliament since the beginning of 2022.
Duguid also voted against proposals to examine the impact of increasing windfall taxes, which would impact the dividends paid to shareholders.
The Guardian reported that an analysis of BP’s shareholder register suggests Duguid moved his shares into his wife’s name five years before he became an MP.
READ MORE: SNP president calls for land reform over DLC's Loch Tay compound plans
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard has now written to both the Cabinet Office and the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards demanding “full transparency” on the issue.
Sheppard said: “Serious questions must now be asked as to whether David Duguid broke the ministerial code by failing to declare his wife’s huge shares in BP.
“This revelation underlines the argument that Scottish Tory MPs only have one interest, and that is their own personal gain.
“Would Duguid have had the same desire to oppose a windfall tax on energy companies if he wasn’t set to profit from it? I highly doubt it.
“That is why a full, independent inquiry is essential to clarify if Mr Duguid has, indeed, broken the ministerial code. Full transparency is absolutely key in order to get to the bottom of this.”
In the letter, Sheppard said the investigation by the Guardian raises questions about the processes for ministerial declarations, particularly concerning the declaration of interests of family members.
It states: “Despite Mr Duguid's involvement with energy policy in the Scotland Office, his wife's shares were also not included in the list of ministers' interests published by the Cabinet Office.
READ MORE: Alex Salmond to launch new current affairs show Scotland Speaks
“As a junior minister, he held meetings with lobbyists from Oil and Gas UK (now known as Offshore Energies UK), which includes BP among its members, and he attended the opening of OEUK's new offices in Aberdeen in August 2021.
“You will be aware that the ministerial code explicitly requires newly appointed ministers to provide a list of all interests held by themselves, their spouses, and close family members that could present a conflict of interest.”
A spokesperson for Duguid has insisted the MP abided by the rules.
Since the start of 2022, the Tory MP has declared interest in BP in two debates in parliament, but only referencing his prior employment of 25 years in the oil and gas industry, 10 of which were spent working for BP.
Duguid was a junior minister in the Scotland Office under Boris Johnson between June 2020 and September 2021, and again, briefly, under Liz Truss in October 2022.
During his time as a minister, Duguid met nine times with lobbyists from the oil and gas trade association OEUK.
Under the current system, MPs are required to declare any holdings in a company over £70,000.
For ministers, all interests held by themselves, their spouses and family members that could give rise to a conflict must be provided to the department’s permanent secretary.
This includes shareholdings under the parliamentary threshold of £70,000, with a decision then made by the independent adviser on ministers' interests which “relevant” interests are published publicly.
A spokesperson for Duguid said: “Mr Duguid followed the prevailing rules for reporting relevant financial interests.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here