SCOTLAND'S former health secretary has said there must be a “fundamental and complete change of leadership” at Scotland’s biggest health board.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHS GGC) has been plagued by issues of safety at its flagship Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) campus and transparency concerns in recent years following the deaths of patients – including a 10-year-old girl – linked to infections which contributed to the setting up of a public inquiry.
An adult and a child also died after they contracted cryptococcus, an infection linked to pigeon droppings.
Jeane Freeman, who set up the inquiry during her time as health secretary, told the Sunday Mail the leadership of the board believed “they can do no wrong and everyone else is wrong” and “everyone is out to get them”.
READ MORE: Which journalists were guests at George Osborne's wedding?
Reports released by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, which he obtained from a whistleblower, suggested the health board had been informed when the hospital opened in 2015 of infection risks.
Freeman, however, said she did not believe her predecessors were aware of the issues, telling the newspaper: “It leads me to conclude they didn’t know.
"I’m not convinced government officials knew as I was finding out about some of it thanks to the whistleblowers and investigations into what they were telling me and also Anas Sarwar.
“It was clear to me that my officials didn’t know (about the problems).
“My chief nursing officer didn’t know. I’m certain ministers didn’t know and not at all convinced government knew either.
“That’s wrong – we are accountable to people in Scotland for safe health care.”
She added: “From the outset and pre-dating the current chief executive and board, it appears to be about not telling the exact truth, either by omission or by misdirection and that’s just shocking.”
On how the issues at the board can be fixed, Freeman said: “The only thing that is going to fix this is a fundamental and complete change in leadership.
READ MORE: Firm who donated to Tories are now Scottish Labour's biggest backer
“If you have a situation where people are not trusting what is being said, you have to change who is leading.
“Sometimes that’s not fair. It’s not always those individuals’ fault but it’s the only way to move on.”
But a spokesman for the board said they “categorically refute” claims they were “anything other than transparent” on the issues with the hospital.
“Scottish Government were closely involved in the project both during the construction and in the years that followed the opening of the hospitals,” he added.
The former health secretary – who stood down from the role and Holyrood in 2021 – said she met the board’s leadership after reports about the bird-dropping infections broke.
“When this issue came to my desk, the chief executive of NHS Scotland, chief medical officer Catherine Calderwood and I went to QEUH and met (chief executive) Jane Grant,” she said.
“I was told there was nothing to see here and the issue didn’t warrant all this attention. I contradicted them and said there was. The atmosphere felt hostile.
“There was a real sense of, ‘who do you think you are, why are you asking us these questions?’
“It wasn’t just directed to me but to the chief medical officer and chief executive of the NHS.
READ MORE: Angus MacNeil and Brendan O'Hara bust-up 'not evidence of party split'
“It was the same – ‘There’s no problem, we’ve sorted it.’ They hadn’t sorted it and the attitude has not changed.”
The spokesman added: “As a core participant in the Scottish Hospitals Public Inquiry, we have submitted more than 12,500 documents, including all the papers outlining communications between NHSGGC and ministers.
“This includes evidence that ministers were briefed on potential issues from as early as 2015.
“It is for Lord Brodie and the public inquiry to consider these matters and we will continue to participate fully to answer any questions and assist the inquiry to fulfil its remit.
“At all times in our engagement with ministers, NHSGGC senior management have been respectful and professional.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel