IN Keir Starmer’s mission to win the next General Election, he has U-turned on key pledges and abandoned longstanding Labour orthodoxy.
As the party has turned more and more blue, discontent from within the party has surfaced in bits and parts.
Indeed, on Monday, an anonymous Labour MP accused the head honcho of creating a “culture of fear” in which the party’s left-wing MPs are worried of being ousted ahead of next year’s General Election.
*If you like my newsletter and would like to receive it every Thursday at 6pm, subscribe here.
The former shadow secretary of state told i: “MPs are now going through their social media deleting everything that could be seen as even slightly contentious. It’s sinister.”
Opposition has generally been kept in check, though, by said "culture of fear/Keir" ... until now.
Monica Lennon – MSP for Central Scotland – certainly made her disapproval known on Twitter after Starmer said his party would not commit to scrapping the two-child benefit cap.
Starmer was making a speech on Thursday morning in Gillingham when he was asked by a reporter from The Sun to confirm whether getting rid of the rule was the party’s policy after shadow work and pension secretary Jonathan Ashworth said last month it was “heinous”.
Starmer said: “Obviously that isn’t our policy and if that changes I’ll let you know.”
The two-child cap was introduced in 2017 by George Osbourne and restricts benefits support to the first two children.
The measure attracted huge controversy over the so-called “rape clause”, which forced women to reveal pregnancies arising from non-consensual sex to qualify for some benefit.
Lennon took aim at Starmer's U-turn – after all, he committed to scrapping it three years ago – calling the policy "abhorrent".
I know colleagues are scared of deselection, being exiled to backbenches, or not winning selections but if we don’t speak out then who will?
— Monica Lennon MSP (@MonicaLennon7) July 6, 2023
The two-child benefit cap (aka the rape clause) is abhorrent and must be scrapped. @UKLabour policies must be progressive and humane. https://t.co/GCuuXrF3sd
She tweeted: “I know colleagues are scared of deselection, being exiled to backbenches, or not winning selections, but if we don’t speak out then who will?
“The two-child benefit cap (aka the rape clause) is abhorrent and must be scrapped. @UKLabour policies must be progressive and humane.”
Labour closes in
Despite all of this, a new poll suggests Labour have closed the gap with the SNP to three points going into the next General Election.
The Survation poll found that Branch Office leader Anas Sarwar’s party has managed a four-point swing compared with a survey conducted two months ago, with the SNP now on 37%, Labour at 34%, the Conservatives on 17% and the Liberal Democrats on 9%.
If this were to remain correct, this would put Labour and the SNP almost neck-and-neck in terms of the number of seats that would be won at the next General Election.
Although, interestingly, instead of a direct flow of voters from the SNP to Labour, the narrowing lead is a result of Labour gaining support across all parties.
If you have anything you'd like to see from the newsletter, get in touch at james.walker@newsquest.co.uk
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel