AN SNP MP has raised concerns that the views of LGBT+ politicians in Scotland on gender reform are being “policed” by their straight colleagues.
Commenting on Tory MSP Jamie Greene losing his position in the Scottish Conservative shadow cabinet over his backing of the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill, SNP MP Joanna Cherry said that it was part of a “unpleasant pattern” in Scottish politics.
She tweeted: “There’s an unpleasant pattern in Scottish politics whereby the beliefs of lesbian & gay politicians on gender identity are closely policed by straight colleagues.
“I support Jamie’s right to his beliefs as I hope he would support mine.”
On Sunday, Greene told the BBC that while he wasn’t given a reason for being dropped from his party’s frontbench in Holyrood, it was “probably” because he voted in favour of the Scottish Government’s gender reform bill, which was later blocked by Westminster.
READ MORE: LibDems use Brexiteer cash in bid to oust SNP in Skye
During the final debates about the legislation, Greene was praised by members of other parties for attempting to find compromise on the issue.
But despite giving MSPs a free vote on the bill, Douglas Ross decided that Greene’s views were incompatible with a position on the shadow cabinet and sacked him from his role as justice spokesperson.
Cherry has been an outspoken critic of her party’s gender reform proposals for years.
After fellow gay MP Alyn Smith called on those who disagreed with the SNP’s policy on gender reform to leave the party, Cherry said SNP rebels were “not going anywhere”.
There are currently no transgender MSPs in the Scottish Parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel