TRADE unions have criticised the Scottish Government for greenlighting the UK’s investment zone plans in Aberdeen and Glasgow.
Each region will now qualify for numerous tax relief measures as well as being backed by up £80 million.
The zones were initially cooked up by former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng during Liz Truss’s tenure as prime minister.
However, they have been carried forward by Jeremy Hunt who announced that 12 new zones would be created across the UK, including two in Scotland, to “drive business investment and level up” back in March.
The Scottish Government’s Wellbeing Economy Secretary, Neil Gray, said that the zones would “enhance” the country’s economy after being tailored to suit Scotland’s net zero ambitions.
READ MORE: Aberdeen and Glasgow to become first 'investment zones' in Scotland
But the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) has blasted the scheme as being incompatible with ambitions for a wellbeing economy, which plans to untether economic measures of success from GDP growth.
Roz Foyer, the STUC's general secretary, said: “In the same week that the IMF announced corporate profits are the main driver of inflation across Europe, it’s regrettable and illuminating of their priorities that the Scottish Government would sign off on a scheme that incentivises corporate tax breaks.
“For all the tinkering and alleged amending this scheme will now have in Scotland, we must ensure government rhetoric matches government action and that Fair Work is at the heart of any plan for economic growth.
“All the evidence shows that tax avoidance zones displace existing economic activity, rather than create new economic activity.
READ MORE: SNP to meet crucial audit deadline with one 'qualification'
“If the Scottish Government are serious about creating a wellbeing economy, they should prioritise their Community Wealth Building approach over this scheme which seeks to prioritise those at the top.
“We need a robust system of taxation for the super-wealthy, including wealth and property taxes which benefit, first and foremost, those most in need.”
Conservation charities have also previously expressed concern about investment zones, with the RSPB blasting them as an “attack on nature” which will result in building taking place “anywhere” regardless of its impact of biodiversity.
However, business groups have welcomed the move, with the Scottish Chambers of Commerce claiming the zones "will help galvanise the key sectors in these regions to innovate".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel