THE Scottish Government has dropped its plans to restrict fishing in 10% of Scotland’s waters following an uproar from coastal communities.
Net-Zero Secretary Mairi McAllan announced the plan to introduce highly protected marine areas (HPMAs) by 2026 will no longer go ahead. It is understood that the decision was made involving both SNP and Green ministers.
HPMAs aimed to see an end to the vast majority of human activities that may cause negative impacts on the environment in specific areas around Scotland's coasts.
It would have meant no fishing, no aquaculture, no oil and gas exploration, no commercial seaweed harvesting, and no offshore wind infrastructure in those places.
READ MORE: Highly Protected Marine Areas and the storm brewing in Scotland's coastal waters
Campaigners had said the HPMAs were necessary because Scotland's seas are in "historically bad condition".
Meanwhile, groups representing fishing industries were strongly opposed to the HPMA proposals and some SNP politicians joined in the criticism.
Speaking on Thursday, McAllan stressed the need to prevent damage to marine ecosystems.
She said the Government will develop a “new pathway and timetable”, in line with plans to make Scotland “nature-positive” by 2030.
Elspeth Macdonald, chief executive of the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation, welcomed the move to scrap the “flawed” HPMAs.
She said: “Ministers will now need to re-assure people that they are not simply intent on introducing the same policy by the back door."
Do you support shelving the policy plan? Vote in our poll below, and add your comment in the comments section.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel