POLICE Scotland’s outgoing chief constable has denied Nicola Sturgeon was tipped off about the arrest of her husband, describing the suggestion as “absolutely outrageous”.
Sir Iain Livingstone, who is set to retire this summer, told STV his officers had acted with “total integrity” during the investigation into the SNP’s finances.
Among those who raised questions was former SNP deputy leader Jim Sillars, who urged Police Scotland to say if the former first minister had been told her husband Peter Murrell may be arrested.
Speaking in April he said: "I have already had people saying to me 'what was the timeline' between Nicola Sturgeon knowing there may be a problem in respect of her husband with the police and her resignation.
READ MORE: SNP MP says forensic tent outside Nicola Sturgeon home unusual
“That is a question people are quite legitimately asking.”
But Livingstone said nobody in his force had informed the Scottish Government that Murrell was about to be taken into custody.
He said: “Categorically not, absolutely outrageous suggestion to imply that I or my investigative team act with anything other than total integrity,” he said.
Livingstone also told STV's Scotland Tonight that there had been no enquiries from Sturgeon’s office to about the status of the police investigation.
He said: “Absolutely not, I don’t think they would.
READ MORE: Jo Farrell appointed Police Scotland's first female Chief Constable
“Now, people may feel I could have done other things as the chief constable, that I could have done more of this, less of that, but I don’t think any senior politician, or anybody who has observed policing in the last number of years in Scotland, would think that I am anything other than totally operationally independent – and I guard that rigorously.”
Previously Livingstone defended the decision to raid the home of Sturgeon and Murrell and erect a large tent placed across the entrance as “proportionate and necessary.”
In an interview earlier this month he denied the move was politically motivated, saying the search warrant was independently approved by a judge.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel