SOCIAL justice secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has challenged the UK Government to adopt a key international agreement on children’s rights as she confirmed changes will be made to legislation to allow it to be introduced in Scotland.
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) bill was passed unanimously by MSPs but blocked by the Supreme Court after a challenge by UK ministers.
In an update to Holyrood, Sommerville said changes will be brought forward after the parliamentary recess which will mean public authorities will only be required to comply with the UNCRC requirements when delivering duties under powers in an act of the Scottish Parliament.
READ MORE: John Swinney: Scotland in 'ludicrous position' after bills rejected by UK Supreme Court
She told Holyrood that this is the only way to minimise the risk of a further referral to the Supreme Court, while also minimising the complexity for those using the legislation.
However she also called for the UK Government to adopt the convention into UK law as the “simplest way” to secure children’s rights.
Somerville said: “These proposals will result in a bill that provides valuable protections for children’s rights and that does so in a way that is legally sound and is clear for users.
“It will also allow us to begin our journey to legislate for children's rights and wider human rights and provide a solid legal foundation on which to build in the future. That would become easier if there was political commitment in Whitehall to legislate for children’s rights.
“Once again we find the democratic will of this Parliament blocked by Westminster. It remains true that the simplest way to secure protection for children’s rights, in Scotland and across the UK, and to do so as fully as possible, is for the UK Government to incorporate the UNCRC into UK law.”
Responding to the statement to MSPs, Scottish Tory deputy leader Meghan Gallacher said she was becoming “increasingly annoyed” by the government’s “inability to legislate”.
She said: “It has been 834 days since the UNCRC bill was passed in this parliament, 630 days since the Supreme Court ruled in favour of the UK Government’s challenge to the bill.
“That’s 630 days for this government to decide whether or not to write a letter to the UK Government about the UNCRC bill. No wonder nothing gets done in this place.
“Instead of making the necessary changes to this bill, the SNP have deliberately provoked grievance, have continued to politicise children’s rights, have played constitutional games and have prioritised a debate on independence this afternoon.”
She added: “We still don’t know when this bill will come back to parliament, what on earth has this government been doing?”
However Sommerville responded that she presumed Gallacher did not understand the process that the reconsideration of the legislation would have to go through.
She said: “It must go through the parliamentary authorities step and I am not in charge of that part, Meghan Gallacher.
READ MORE: UN to Scotland: Hurry up and fix Westminster-blocked children's bill
“We are absolutely determined to bring this back to the chamber at the earliest opportunity after the summer recess once it is passed through the parliamentary authorities, the timetable of which I cannot fix.”
She said she hoped there would be progress and the ability of the bill to be “worked through before Christmas”, but said it would be subject to the parliamentary process and its timetable.
She went on: “And I am becoming increasingly annoyed about our inability to protect children’s rights within this parliament – that is what annoys me about this process and the reason we have taken time to look at this is to see how we can have the maximum protection possible for our children and young people.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel