DEPUTY Prime Minister Oliver Dowden has claimed that no-deal Brexit planning made the UK “match fit” ahead of the pandemic, while an expert told the Covid inquiry that Westminster was “not operationally prepared”.
Oliver Dowden, who was minister for the Cabinet Office from July 2019 to February 2020 and had previously worked in the department, told the UK Covid-19 inquiry that planning for a no-deal Brexit put the country in a “strong position” to respond to other challenges.
However, the inquiry heard earlier from the UK Government’s former chief scientific adviser who said the UK was “not operationally prepared” for a pandemic.
READ MORE: Believe in Scotland to host Edinburgh rally alongside Yes for EU
It comes after former Tory chancellor George Osborne told the inquiry that austerity cuts had better prepared the UK for the pandemic, and rejected claims that the policy depleted the NHS - despite the fact that medics and unions repeatedly said the cuts left health and social care in a “parlous state”.
And now, DPM Dowden has suggested that the “flip-side” to planning for a no-deal Brexit was that it forced Government departments to work closer together.
Hugo Keith KC, counsel to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, asked Dowden about a 2019 memo about the National Security Council THRC (threats hazards and resilience contingencies programmes) which suggested that work on pandemic influenza was expected to be affected by the “step-up in planning for a no-deal exit from the European Union”.
Dowden (pictured below, left) said: “We had to ensure that we allocated resources according to where the greatest risk lay.
“Now, it was the case at that time that ‘no deal’ was the default position of the Government, so – and this is worth remembering the kind of frankly, apocryphal warnings that were being delivered about the consequences of no-deal Brexit, for example in relation to medicine supplies and elsewhere – it was appropriate that … we shifted the resilience function to deal with this.
“Secondly, it was not a permanent shift, we knew that this thing would come to an end since we had an endpoint for if we didn’t reach a deal, no deal would happen.”
He added that there was a “flip side” to the preparations for a no-deal Brexit, known as Operation Yellowhammer, which made the UK “match fit” for the pandemic.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn CAUTIONED by Speaker after questioning Rishi Sunak's honesty
“There was a flip side to this which was that the preparation, particularly through the Yellowhammer structures, made us match fit for when … we did have to deal with the the actual materialisation of the Covid pandemic – that is to say it forced Government departments to work together closely, so there’s a lot more cross-government co-ordination,” he said.
“In addition, in relation to this we searched additional capacity into the department, I believe we recruited around 15,000 extra staff, who then were able to be redeployed once the threat of no deal had passed in order to further step up our preparedness, to contribute to our Covid response.”
Earlier, Professor Sir Mark Walport, the Government’s former chief scientific adviser. said the UK was “not operationally prepared” for a pandemic.
He told the UK Covid-19 Inquiry: “I think, scientifically, the country was quite prepared then in the sense that it was recognised. I think operation preparedness is another matter.
“I think it’s clear that we were not operationally prepared.”
He added: “I think that focus in richer countries has moved away from infectious diseases after the Second World War.
“With the rise of chronic inflammatory diseases, cardiac disease, hypertension, diabetes, there was much more of a focus on those and away from infection.”
It came after a Tory former health minister said “making money is not a crime” as he defended the VIP lane for coronavirus-related contracts which saw some politically-connected firms make huge profits.
READ MORE: Fergus Ewing 'set to lose party whip' after vote against Lorna Slater
Lord Bethell also blamed “longstanding” inequalities for the NHS not being sufficiently prepared for the pandemic.
He was speaking after former prime minister David Cameron and his chancellor Osborne rejected claims at the inquiry that their austerity measures left the UK exposed to the pandemic.
Medics and unions have insisted that cuts to public services under their leadership between 2010 and 2016 depleted health and social care capacity.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel