NADINE Dorries has claimed a “shadow of doubt” hangs over a report which cleared an MP of allegations he bullied her.
The former culture secretary, who served under Boris Johnson, had accused the SNP’s John Nicolson of bullying her because of offensive tweets about her he had liked and retweeted – but the findings of an earlier investigation were overturned by a new report published on Tuesday.
Nicolson was cleared of bullying the former minister, in a decision Dorries branded disappointing.
She responded to the report’s findings in a Twitter thread and claimed that “in any workplace other than Parliament”, Nicolson would have been “dismissed” for his actions.
She tweeted: “A report into the conduct of John Nicholson towards myself has been published today.
“My complaint was upheld by the Standards Commissioner.”
READ MORE: SNP MP cleared of 'bullying Nadine Dorries' claims by standards panel
Quoting from the report, she continued: “Over a 24-hour period John Nicolson MP tweeted, ‘liked’ or retweeted disparaging material about Nadine Dorries 168 times, and in particular b. ‘liked’ tweets which described Nadine Dorries as ‘grotesque’, a ‘vacuous goon’, and as having been ‘rag-dolled’ by him.”
Dorries added: “The Standards Commissioner could not consider complaints regarding other forms of intimidation as Nicholson was covered by Parliamentary Privilege and could only consider external 168 tweets in 24 [hours].
“Nicholson appealed and the Standards Commissioners decision was overturned by a sub panel.
“In any workplace other than Parliament where the rule of law, not privilege applies, Nicholson would have been instantly dismissed.
“I’m disappointed that the Standards Commissioner’s verdict has been overturned in this way. It seems strange to me that it can be done on the basis of 'new evidence' which I have not seen or been given the opportunity to respond to.
“Once again, a shadow of doubt cast over parliamentary process and the conduct of individual MPs.”
It comes after a Parliament’s Independent Expert Panel overturned a judgment of the standards commissioner after Dorries complained about Nicolson’s Twitter activity.
The panel found the standards commissioner had not interpreted Parliament’s bullying rules in such a way which gave due weight to the right of MPs to strongly criticise the Government.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel