THE negotiations that led to the first independence referendum should have been about more than getting a “one-off kick of the ball”, an SNP MSP has said, suggesting that Alex Salmond’s handling of the situation a decade ago put Scotland "in the dilemma we are now".
Jim Fairlie, who represents Perthshire South and Kinross-shire, also argued against the former first minister’s proposals of fielding only one Yes-backing candidate in each constituency at the next General Election.
Salmond, now the leader of the Alba party, wrote to SNP MPs earlier in June urging them to enter into a “Scotland United for Independence” pact.
While he agreed there should be “a united front”, Fairlie said it should be about uniting behind a party that “can actually win”.
READ MORE: Jim Fairlie: SNP's 2011 election landslide deserved more than indyref1
Writing in The National, Fairlie drew attention to the Supreme Court’s ruling that Holyrood does not have the power to hold an independence referendum without Westminster consent.
He went on: “It’s clear that was part of the deal for the Labour party from day one and we shouldn’t let them forget it. They thought devolution would kill the idea of independence – but put controls in the Scotland Act just to make sure.
“Alex Salmond was part of this process, which perhaps his supporters don’t want to talk about. And, of course, signing the Edinburgh Agreement under Section 30 set the precedent for where we are now.
“I know hindsight is a wonderful thing, but perhaps if Alex had used that phenomenal 2011 win as a means of demanding to amend the Scotland Act to return the constitutional powers to Holyrood ad infinitum, rather than for a one-off kick of the ball, we wouldn’t be in the dilemma we are now?”
Fairlie (above) said that the next General Election should be fought on the issue of having the power to hold a referendum devolved to Holyrood.
He wrote: “For me, that is what our demand must be in the Westminster election. If we win, we should demand that constitutional affairs be returned to Holyrood so that it is within the powers of the Parliament that sits in Edinburgh to ask the people what they want their constitutional future to be.
“It should have always been in the hands of the people of Scotland, it wasn’t the Labour party’s gift to give away. If we win, that power should be returned.”
Alba said that their MP Neale Hanvey had already proposed a Scotland (Self-Determination) Bill at Westminster which would see the power to hold indyref2 devolved – adding that “quite disgracefully, [it] has been signed by only a handful of SNP MPs”.
Responding to Fairlie’s piece, Alba’s national organisation convener Denise Findlay said that successive SNP election wins had achieved nothing since Salmond stepped down as the party’s chief.
Findlay told The National: “Jim Fairlie clearly wasn’t active in the SNP at the time of the 2011 election landslide and it shows in his article.
“Alex Salmond required only one election mandate to deliver Scotland’s independence referendum, which, although it was not won, transformed independence support from below 30% to near 50%.
“Since then, successive SNP election mandates have achieved the square root of nothing, and it is Einstein’s definition of madness to believe that repeating a campaign for a referendum will result in anything other than another Westminster refusal.”
READ MORE: Alex Salmond writes to SNP MPs about strategy for next General Election
She went on: “A section 30 referendum is not the only democratic way to independence, nor is it even a ‘gold standard’. It was right for its time, but the ill-fated venture to the Supreme Court has now given Westminster the confidence to say no forever and a day.
“The SNP are in substantial political trouble, and the cloud over the party is not likely to disperse any time soon. The positive way forward for the national movement is to promote the idea that all independence parties campaign together with one candidate in each constituency seeking a popular mandate to directly negotiate our national independence from Westminster.”
Findlay insisted that Alba’s proposal would see the national conversation shift from “how many seats the SNP will lose to Labour [to] how many seats the Yes alliance can win”.
The SNP are due to hold a convention on independence on June 24 in Dundee. However, it has recently been confirmed that the party’s strategy will not be decided at that event, but instead at a national conference later in the year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel