THE Supreme Court’s judgment to deny Scotland an independence referendum by dismissing the country’s right to self-determination was wrong, a leading lawyer has said.
Alba MP Neale Hanvey commissioned internationally-renowned public law expert Professor Robert McCorquodale to assess the verdict delivered in November last year and will publish his findings next week.
The Brick Court Chambers lawyer, noted by legal bible Legal 500 as having an “impressive background in all aspects of public international law”, said “the Supreme Court was mistaken in law in its approach to the right to self-determination of the people of Scotland in the Scottish Referendum reference case”.
READ MORE: Alba hire lawyers to probe alternatives to SNP's de facto vote
Supreme Court judge Lord Reed doused hopes for indyref2 when he rejected arguments the SNP submitted arguing the court must consider Scotland’s right to self-determination according to the founding charter of the United Nations.
The court ruled that “the right to self–determination is not in issue” in the case.
Alba said Prof. McCorquodale’s findings were “ground-breaking”.
He served as the director of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL) for 10 years and is also a professor of international law and human rights at Nottingham University.
Alba said they would set out his findings at a press conference in the House of Commons on Tuesday.
The opinion is separate from work commissioned by the party as a whole.
Alba have also asked two experienced KCs and a top-flight London law firm to examine the same question. The party said those contracted have not yet reached conclusions.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel