WHOEVER ordered a week of political chaos to coincide with a heatwave must have a very warped sense of humour indeed.
We should all be lounging in the garden eating ice lollies, not frantically scrolling Twitter to keep up to date with the latest bombshell to drop.
It started – as annoying things so often do – with Boris Johnson. His resignation was the first shockwave, and it was followed shortly after by Nicola Sturgeon being arrested and then released without charge.
We’d all hoped for a wee breather at this point - a protected space of time where we could re-apply the factor 50 and scrape the rust off the barbeque.
READ MORE: FMQs: Douglas Ross 'deflecting' from Boris Johnson scandal
No such luck, as Thursday saw the long-awaited release of the Standard’s Committee’s report into Boris Johnson’s partygate antics.
You will have probably caught up with by now but if you haven’t, here’s a recap.
Boris Johnson lied to the House of Commons. He lied to the Privileges Committee. He’s also lied to every woman that has ever visited his bedchamber but that wasn’t actually within the purview of the committee.
Against the backdrop of this turbulent week, FMQs was only ever going to go one of two ways.
🗣️ 'Nobody in this country will forget that Douglas Ross backed Boris Johnson to the very hilt' @HumzaYousaf said the Scottish Tory leader was trying to 'dodge' and 'deflect' from today's report about the former PM pic.twitter.com/usiAiLrmBK
— The National (@ScotNational) June 15, 2023
It would either be a mud-slinging free-for-all or a damp squib – in recognition of the fact that both the SNP and the Tories have family drama going on right now that they’d rather not get into in the Holyrood chamber.
Douglas Ross asked about an important – but somewhat unexpected – issue in his first question, signalling what was to be the start of a shaky truce between the pair.
He asked Humza Yousaf about delays to the dualling of the A9 between Perth and Inverness. He spoke about road traffic deaths along that stretch of road and went on to describe it as “one of the most dangerous roads in the country".
In response, the First Minister said that his government is “absolutely committed” to dualling the A9. He went on to say that it is important that infrastructure projects are good value for money and promised to give an update on progress in Autumn 2023. He finished by offering a “cast-iron guarantee” that the road would be dualled.
Douglas Ross described the First Minister’s response as “one of the most disappointing answers I have heard in this chamber.”
He clearly isn’t up to date with Holyrood business.
That wasn’t even the most disappointing answer to a question offered this week.
Maybe it was this unkind jab that led Humza Yousaf to scrap the “I won’t mention your former leader if you don’t mention ours’ pact. Or maybe it was the fact that it was the final question and he knew Douglas Ross wouldn’t have a chance to reply.
The First Minister made an admirable, if whiplash-inducing, pivot from talking about his new transport team to lambasting Douglas Ross over his party's handling of partygate.
READ MORE: Clip of Douglas Ross calling Boris Johnson a 'truthful man' resurfaces
“This is desperate stuff from Douglas Ross who is trying to dodge – no doubt deflect of course – from the serious scandal that his party is engulfed in,” he said.
“With Boris Johnson not just lying to the House of Commons, but betraying the people of this country and of the UK. When they couldn’t visit a loved one, when they couldn’t attend funerals of a loved one, Boris Johnson was breaking the rules and having parties in Number 10.
"So Douglas Ross can try to deflect, he can try to dodge, but nobody in this country will forget that Douglas Ross backed Boris Johnson to the very hilt."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel