THE SNP’s bid to create a cost of living crisis committee has been voted down by MPs – quashing hopes of a cross-party group which would have explored Brexit’s impact on the economy.
The party had proposed creating a mammoth committee of 45 MPs – chaired by the SNP – to investigate the causes of Britain’s economic woes and whether they were linked to Britain leaving the European Union.
MPs voted 43 to 260 against forming the group, which Labour did not support citing “flaws” in its design and which the UK Government called a “crackpot” idea.
But the SNP have said the refusal of both the Tories and Labour to back their proposal showed both were in “complete denial about the long-term damage their Brexit obsession is inflicting on the cost of living”.
READ MORE: Labour to ABSTAIN on SNP cost-of-living crisis committee vote
Speaking after the vote, the SNP’s Europe spokesperson Alyn Smith said: “The Tories and pro-Brexit Labour Party are in complete denial about the long-term damage their Brexit obsession is inflicting on the cost of living.
"Millions of people across Scotland and the UK are paying higher mortgages, bills and food prices as a result of Brexit, which is fueling inflation and costing our economy billions.
"The SNP is the only party offering real change with independence, which is Scotland's only route back to the EU, sustained economic growth and prosperity.
"At the election next year, the SNP will put independence front-and-centre so Scotland can escape Brexit, tackle the cost of living and get rid of unelected Tory governments for good."
During the Commons debate on forming the committee, Scotland Office minister John Lamont called the plan a “complete waste of taxpayers’ money”.
He said: “The SNP’s motion to establish a select committee to look at the cost-of-living crisis is not only unnecessary duplication of other work by this Parliament, but it is a complete waste of taxpayers’ money.
“The total anticipated cost to the House of Commons for this crackpot idea is in the region of £463,000 per annum […] and, in addition, there would be extra costs to adapt Parliament’s committee rooms to accommodate this massive new committee.”
Labour abstained on the vote, as did the Alba Party’s two MPs and the LibDems.
Ian Murray, the shadow Scotland secretary, said the SNP’s plans were flawed.
READ MORE: 'Shameful' Labour peers abstain from key vote on 'draconian' anti-protest laws
He told MPs: “This may seem like a sensible idea, but it’s when looking at the small print that the flaws of this proposal become clear.
“Now I’m left wondering if the real reason that this is being proposed is for the SNP to try and get one of their many disgruntled members of their group an additional salary payment as being committee chair.”
The Edinburgh South MP added: “Their solution to Brexit, which in their words and mine and many others was a bad idea, is to have Scexit, which indeed would be many magnitudes worse than Brexit.
"They want to repeat the same mistakes and do the same thing.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel