THE Tories have been accused of deliberately “tarnishing” the Scottish Parliament by “misleading” MSPs and “abusing” other members .
In a blistering attack from SNP depute leader Keith Brown, delivered under the guise of a point of order, the Scottish Conservatives were charged with bringing “appalling toxicity” to Holyrood.
Brown cited Douglas Ross’s “misleading” line of questioning at last week’s First Minister’s Questions, during which he grilled the Scottish Government on a charity he said was being harmed by Glasgow’s new low emission zone. It later transpired this was not the case.
Murdo Fraser also came under fire for his contributions in a debate on Wednesday, in which he called Green MSP Maggie Chapman “wired to the moon and on a different planet from the rest of us”.
His comments were met with ire when they were made on Wednesday with an SNP minister claiming the language was “ableist”. Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone said she would look into the matter.
Brown, who spoke following First Minister’s Questions on Thursday, said: “I am aware that under rule 31 of standing orders it is permissible for members to make personal statements conditional upon your agreement and of course subject to scheduling by the parliamentary bureau.
“In the interest of checking that those procedures are being following correctly, can I ask whether you would allow, if requested, Douglas Ross to make a personal statement if he asked for one to allow him to correct the record and to explain why he pursued a misleading line of questioning in last week’s session of FMQs.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross told to correct record after 'misleading parliament' at FMQs
“We know that the Conservatives will oppose virtually any measure on addressing climate change but during Thursday’s session last week, while questioning the First Minister, he attempted to discredit the new low emission zone in Glasgow.
“He stated: ‘Homeless Project Scotland was refused an exemption to use a refrigerated van within the restricted area.’
“And [he] continued a line of questioning which heavily implied the LEZ was condemning the charity to being unable to do the work that it wants to do, failing to clarify of course, that Glasgow City Council had in fact given an exemption to Homeless Project Scotland so it would continue its work.
“Additionally, after FMQs ended Douglas Ross proceeded to share his misleading assertion further on social media and to date has not removed it.
“This disingenuous conduct, allied to the evident and appalling toxicity within the Tory group, exemplified yesterday Presiding Officer by the disgraceful language of Murdo Fraser in attacking, through personal abuse a member of the parliament is, in my view by design tarnishing the reputation of this parliament.”
He added: “Presiding Officer, I seek your advice about how we can ensure opposition leaders like Douglas Ross do not knowingly mislead this chamber and whether you can inform parliament as to whether Douglas Ross has made any attempt to correct the record or seek your permission to make a statement, so that he could explain why he thought it was acceptable to pursue a misleading line of questioning during FMQs? “
The Presiding Officer said members’ contributions were a matter for themselves.
The Scottish Conservatives were approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel