KEIR Starmer is facing calls not to abandon the Labour Party’s previous promise to compensate women who missed out on pension payments.
Former shadow minister Rebecca Long-Bailey publicly challenged the Labour Leader in the i to hand the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) cohort the multi-million pound settlement previously promised by Jeremy Corbyn.
Waspi refers to women born in the 1950s who had their payments reduced after the state pension age was raised shortly before they were due to retire. The alteration was imposed without giving the workers affected time to plan for the income cut, leaving many short.
In 2019, former Labour leader Corbyn said Labour would offer compensation to those affected, but Starmer has so far declined to make any policy commitment.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer accused of flip-flopping on housing and EU voters
Long-Bailey, who ran against Starmer in the Labour leadership contest, urged her party to commit to the compensation in its next election manifesto.
She told i: “Only Labour has had the courage to seek to rectify and mitigate this injustice so righting a historic wrong for these women is ‘Unfinished Business’ for the next Labour government.
“The Waspi campaigners are rightly looking to Labour to deliver the justice for them that the Tories never will.
“Of course, Labour’s 2019 commitment must be updated and refined to take account of the impact of Covid, and the disastrous Tory mini-Budget which has done so much damage to the economy.
“However, compensating the Waspi women is affordable. A tax on wealth, profits of big corporations and ‘big money’ in the City could all help pay for it. There’s plenty of money available, if the political will is there to deliver a compensation package.
“Labour’s manifesto must retain a commitment to recompense the women for the money they have lost within the first five years of our party’s term in government.”
“Paying the promised compensation over the court of a five-year parliament is realistic and achievable. Irrespective of electoral considerations, it’s the right thing to do for these women,” she said.
“The trauma, hardship, poverty and sheer stress these women have been put through for a decade, must make justice for them a matter of urgency. “
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here