DOUGLAS Ross had to be reprimanded at a Westminster committee hearing after he interrupted an SNP MP who he claimed had been “going on for quite a while”.
The Scottish Tory leader was meant to be one of the MPs questioning Scotland Office minister John Lamont and Malcolm Offord, alongside the Scottish Secretary Alister Jack, on the work of the UK Government in Scotland.
But instead Ross took aim at SNP MP Deirdre Brock, who had been asking about the allocation of two targeted funding packages in Scotland.
On March 15, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt announced that the Tory government would provide “up to £8.6m of targeted funding for the Edinburgh Festivals as well as £1.5m funding to repair the Cloddach Bridge” in Ross’s Moray constituency.
Brock said that other cultural organisations in Scotland had been “surprised” by the money announced for the festivals, going on: “Certainly there have been questions raised about the bridge in Mr Ross’s constituency.”
At that point the Scottish Tory leader interrupted: “Can you name the bridge?”
Brock said she could not, prompting Ross to say: “Well maybe don’t ask about something you don’t know …”
The chair of the Scottish Affairs Committee, SNP MP Pete Wishart, called for order, prompting Ross to say: “Ms Brock has spent a large part of this time, if I can, chair.”
“No, you can’t,” Wishart responded.
“So you’re not allowing a member to speak?” Ross asked, adding: “God. It’s been going on for quite a while," when told that Brock was asking a question.
A couple of minutes after the exchange, Ross and Wishart could be seen quietly exchanging words as other members continued to discuss funding.
The UK Government money allocated to Edinburgh Festivals sparked a backlash after it was announced that the cash would be spent on a "community hub" to provide "support" for performers.
Glasgow comic Janey Godley said at the time: “Great, just what the Edinburgh Fringe needs – new offices.
“As a regular Fringe performer, I can count on one hand the times I used the Fringe office – we have to pay £300 odd to get listed in a brochure and social media has even made that obsolete – what a carry-on.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel