JEREMY Hunt has been pulled up by the official statistics watchdog over inaccuracy in his claims about public debt.
The Chancellor sent out a tweet on April 25 which claimed public debt levels would fall in the coming years when in fact they are simply forecast to rise less steeply than previously expected.
According to the Guardian, the head of the UK Statistics Authority Sir Robert Chote is now writing to Hunt and the Treasury to warn them about accuracy after Labour MP Angela Eagle made a complaint about the post.
READ MORE: Margaret Ferrier: Will the MP face a by-election in Rutherglen and Hamilton West?
Hunt said the government had “made progress” on public finances tweeting: “By 2027-28, headline debt levels are reduced by £53.7 billion.”
Former Treasury minister Eagle then wrote to Chote noting that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasts indicate that public debt will rise between now and 2027/28, including a £90bn increase from 2026/27 alone.
She said Hunt was referring to a fall in the OBR’s current projection for headline debt in 2027/28 compared with the same forecast in last year’s autumn statement, expressing concern that the Government was using “misleading statistics”.
In a reply, Chote said Treasury officials had confirmed this was what the tweet referred to: a reduction in the size of the forecast increase of debt, not a fall in the debt itself.
“As you suggest, some readers of the tweet may have assumed that the chancellor was referring to the forecast change in public sector net debt between the last full financial year and 2027-28,” he wrote.
“Greater clarity and context would have avoided this confusion. The Office for Statistics Regulation [the regulatory arm of the UKSA] has therefore spoken with officials at HM Treasury to emphasise the importance of consistently adopting a transparent and accessible approach to communicating statistics and data in line with our guidance on intelligent transparency.”
The Treasury said it would take necessary action.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel