SCOTTISH Labour have been accused of “political point scoring” over HPMAs amid another Holyrood debate on the issue.
Highly Protected Marine Areas (HPMAs), a part of the SNP-Green Bute House Agreement, are areas which would remove the vast majority of human activity that could cause a negative impact on the environment.
This includes fishing, aquaculture, oil and gas exploration, commercial seaweed harvesting and offshore wind infrastructure, with the Scottish Government policy intending to designate 10% of Scotland’s seas as HPMAs by 2026.
READ MORE: Welsh independence march aims to boost campaign amid 'muscular Unionism'
There have been numerous debates on the issue of HPMAs since Humza Yousaf took over the role as First Minister, with Tuesday’s session of Parliament focusing on the success of a song protesting the proposals.
Skipinnish teamed up with a 64-year-old fisherman Donald Francis MacNeil to produce a song protesting the introduction of these zones and comparing them to the Highland Clearances.
The band’s co-founder Angus MacPhail penned The Clearances Again to stand against the plans and give a voice to those who disagree with what is being proposed.
The success of the song was debated in Holyrood after a motion brought by Scottish Labour MSP Rhoda Grant had enough support from fellow MPs, including Tories, LibDems and SNP backbencher Fergus Ewing.
However, Grant and Scottish Labour were accused of politicising the issue by Scottish Greens MSP Ariane Burgess.
“Firstly, I believe it’s irresponsible, inflammatory and misleading to compare HPMAs to the Highland Clearances,” she told the Chamber.
“If the member truly believed this policy was so damaging, why did she and her Labour colleagues stand on a manifesto covering 20% of Scotland’s seas?
“The truth is Labour care more about political point scoring than they do our coastal communities.
READ MORE: Mhairi Black told off for use of Scots swear word in Commons
“In the ecological and climate crisis, delay matters. Acting quickly is vital to restoring our productivity and resilience.”
Earlier, Grant opened the debate by describing the song about HPMAs as a “protest” against the plans.
“Donald Francis and Skipinnish’s song talks about the Clearances once again,” Grant told MSPs.
“The Clearances is not something easily evoked in the Highlands and Islands, and yet in this instance it is valid.
“People are already selling up, any investment has been shelved and families are already moving out. This will cause depopulation and clear people of the land.
“People will not accept this.”
The Highlands and Islands MSP called on the Parliament to congratulate Skipinnish and MacNeil on the song securing a spot on the top 10 of iTunes downloads for the song in under 24 hours since it was released.
The motion added that it is a protest song which believes the proposals “will ban inshore fishing and all marine activities and impact on the economy of the Highlands and Islands”.
Grant’s motion said the Scottish Government should “heed the reported concerns and revisit this policy”.
Grant previously said the song “spells out the dismay of fishing communities” that “distant decision makers are destroying livelihoods and income at the stroke of a pen”.
READ MORE: Scotland reacts after Alex Cole-Hamilton comments during independence debate
“These are not people who damage the environment, they are people who want to work with it and protect it,” Grant told MSPs.
Mairi McAllan, Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero, told MSPs that there were a number of inaccuracies during the debate, where MSPs had claimed the Scottish Government that the proposals would not ban inshore fishing or all marine activities, but they would be restricted under the plans.
Responding to calls for HPMAs to be scrapped, McAllan said: “People are telling me today, Cabinet Secretary, go back to the drawing board.
“The truth is I never left the drawing board. We are at the drawing board.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel