LABOUR have been challenged on whether they would “rather let the Tories in” than work with the SNP in the event of a hung parliament.
Keir Starmer’s party is facing questions over its position ruling out any deals with the SNP if he fails to gain a majority after the next General Election, expected in autumn 2024.
The SNP believe they could be kingmakers in its aftermath – though Starmer says he would not deal with them because of their position on independence.
Philippa Whitford, the SNP’s Scotland spokesperson in Westminster, said she believed the Labour leader could U-turn on this, as he has on a number of other issues, echoing comments made by her Commons boss Stephen Flynn.
Speaking on the BBC’s Politics Live, Whitford said: “Well obviously, Keir in the last six months or so I would say, has ‘moved on’ which is the new term for U-turn, on many other things. So he says one thing now, he may say something different after the election.”
She added: “The message that Keir’s sending right now to the party that’s won the eight elections that have occurred since the Scottish referendum is, ‘Unless you Scots vote how we tell you, you will have no voice in this government, you will have no place to influence the UK Government’.
“That’s not really a great signal to send out to protect the so-called precious Union.”
READ MORE: Keir Starmer will U-turn on refusal to work with SNP, says Stephen Flynn
Asked whether Labour would ever deal with the SNP, Labour backbencher Emma Lewell-Buck said they would not and compared the SNP with the Conservatives, saying: “The new First Minister is coming up with solutions to solve problems that his party created. Rishi Sunak is trying to come up with solutions to create [sic] problems that his party created. Isn’t it time that we had someone else in Government, a Labour Government?”
Whitford hit back saying it was possible the LibDems may not fare as well at the next General Election as expecting, asking whether Labour would rather see the Conservatives cling onto power, rather than working with the SNP.
She said: “So he’d rather let the Tories into Number 10, if the LibDems don’t get enough to give him control of the house? He’d rather have the Tories in than even have any kind of relationship with the SNP, when we have some of the most progressive social policies in the UK, and therefore in a lot of things, social justice, there would be very little disagreement between us.”
Lewell-Buck responded: “But it goes back to that fundamental. I campaigned in the referendum to make sure the UK wasn’t broken up and that is something I feel incredibly strong about and a lot of Labour MPs do and a lot of people in the country do as well.
“If you remember, you didn’t get the result you wanted in the referendum, you keep banging on about it but you didn’t get the result you wanted.”
Whitford interrupted to ask whether the South Shields MP cared more about the Union than social justice – but was ignored.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel