WES Streeting has said he would not apologise for Labour moving away from a commitment to ditch university tuition fees.
The shadow health secretary said the public finances are in too much of a “mess”, but insisted Labour would still set out plans for a “fairer funding system”.
He said the lesson from the LibDems was that “you don’t go into a general election making promises you can’t keep”.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has confirmed he would “move on” from his commitment to abolish tuition fees.
The SNP branded it Labour’s “Nick Clegg moment”, referencing the moment in 2012 when the former LibDem deputy prime minister was forced to apologise for breaking his pre-election commitment to oppose increasing student tuition fees.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer accused of 'Nick Clegg moment' on tuition fees
Speaking to Sky’s Sophy Ridge on Sunday, Streeting was asked if he was going to apologise for a policy change on tuition fees like the LibDems had in the past.
He said: “I think the important thing is learning from the Liberal Democrats’ experience, you don’t go into a general election making promises you can’t keep.
“We’re not prepared to do that. The truth is the public finances are in such a mess that there are lots of things that we would like to do that, in all honesty, we don’t think we will be able to afford to do.”
Asked if we would say sorry to Labour members who voted for Starmer in the leadership election based on the tuition fees commitment, he said: “They’re Labour Party members and I think Labour Party members totally understand where we are as a party.”
When asked if he would say sorry to people who voted on a “false pledge”, he said: “Well, no. I think people know that in terms of what Keir Starmer stood to be leader of the Labour Party on, the platform he stood on, making Labour electable again, getting us back to power so we can do things, Labour members absolutely support Keir Starmer in that.”
He added: “Look what happened to the Lib Dems. We’re not going to make those mistakes. We will set out plans for a fairer funding system though.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here