THE toll the pandemic has taken on the traditional arts of Scotland is laid bare in a new report.
Almost one fifth of freelancers in the sector have seen their income “totally disappear” while the recruitment and retention of children and young people has been “severely affected”, according to research by Professor Simon McKerrell of Glasgow Caledonian University.
“This, combined with the ageing profile more broadly, makes recruitment and retention of children and young people to Scottish traditional arts the top priority for pandemic recovery across the country,” the report states.
“The ageing profile of Scottish traditional arts is a significant factor both in the effects of Covid and its recovery across the sector.”
The research, commissioned by Creative Scotland and carried out between May and June last year, found that freelancers had suffered the worst financial effects of the pandemic restrictions.
The average income across the sector is between £5000 and £10,000, with 87% of respondents earning less than £20,000 pre-pandemic per annum from Scottish traditional arts.
When asked how this income has been affected by the pandemic, 63% said their income had been either “reduced somewhat”’ or “been badly reduced” with 18% saying their income had “totally disappeared”.
The impact of the pandemic on venues and audiences for Scottish traditional arts has also been “substantial”, according to the report.
Programmers and events organisers said there had been a significant rise in “no shows” to events, a decrease in ticket sales and different responses to live, in-person events from younger to older audiences.
Older audience members, in particular, appear to be slow to return to in-person events and are buying fewer tickets, meaning that programmers for Scottish traditional music events are taking this into account in their programming decisions.
The report goes on to warn that many in the sector felt the full impact of Covid was still to be seen.
“Many venues and festivals are coping with simply providing the events and fulfilling obligations to artists and audiences that have been continually rescheduled over the past two years,” the reports points out.
“One of the consequences of this long delay to promised events is a ‘cost hangover’ as many of these events were costed on 2019/2020 prices and travel, and rising inflation and costs now mean that they are dealing with far higher overheads when providing these events in 2022 and 2023, with static ticket revenues.”
Not is all doom and gloom, however, as the pandemic has accelerated digital trends, presenting opportunities for future growth in Scottish traditional arts for both amateur, voluntary and professional artists and learners, according to the report.
These include new streams of income for professional artists, festivals and events able to reach a more global audience for teaching and performance; the emergence of “live digital” events as meaningful practices for highly localised geographical communities and international communities of practice and the development of higher quality digital learning resources for both students and teachers of Scottish traditional arts.
There is also cross-sectoral collaboration and mutual benefits from cultural tourism and marketing involving Scottish- and heritage-aligned businesses with traditional artists and a diversification of the communities surrounding Scottish traditional arts through greater globalisation and digital preference.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here