CHARLES would find the idea of millions of people giving a “great cry” of allegiance to him abhorrent, it has been claimed – despite the fact that the idea was created “in close consultation with His Majesty The King”.
Lambeth Palace, the office of the Archbishop of Canterbury, announced last weekend that during the coronation service “all persons of goodwill in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of the other realms and the territories, [would be asked] to make their homage, in heart and voice, to their undoubted King, defender of all”.
Called the “Homage to the People”, the idea was brought in to replace the more traditional “Homage of Peers”, where aristocrats gave their allegiance to the monarch.
READ MORE: Does Scotland support a monarchy or a republic? See the results in graphs
Lambeth Palace made clear that the coronation liturgy had been produced “in close consultation with His Majesty The King”.
But Jonathan Dimbleby, the veteran broadcaster who came to know Charles after writing his official autobiography in the 1990s, claimed the idea of a Homage of the People was “ill-advised”.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I can think of nothing that [the King] would find more abhorrent.
“He’s never wanted to be revered, he’s never wanted – so far as I know – to have anyone pay homage to him except in mock terms as a joke.
“He wants, I think, to feel that people will share in the event and I don’t quite know how this might have happened.
“I don’t know for certain but it would seem to me that this was an initiative by the Archbishop, who as we know is strongly evangelical, who thought it would be a good thing to give everyone a chance to pay that homage.
“I think it was well intentioned and rather ill-advised.”
Critics have condemned the Homage of the People, with campaign group Republic describing it as “offensive, tone deaf and a gesture that holds the people in contempt”.
Lambeth Palace has stressed it is an invitation rather than a request.
READ MORE: 'North Korea is laughing': Scotland reacts to call for public to make King oath
“We live in a wonderfully diverse society with many different perspectives and beliefs, and it’s quite right that people decide for themselves how they relate to this moment,” a spokesperson for the Archbishop’s office said.
In 1994, Charles confessed to adultery in an interview with Dimbleby – during a primetime television documentary accompanying the biography. The now-King said it only happened after his marriage to Diana, Princess of Wales had “irretrievably broken down”.
Dimbleby, giving an insight into the King’s personality, described him as a “perfectionist”.
He added: “If there were a Mastermind on the histories of coronations he would definitely have it as his special subject and he would emerge triumphant. He knows his history. He believes therefore it’s got to be done really well.”
Charles has been “closely involved” with the performance of the coronation, Dimbleby said, referring to the King’s interest in the theatre and acting.
“There is an element of performative in him. He is a thespian, he loves the theatre, so he wants it all to work really well,” he added.
The King also wanted to be personally involved in choosing clothes to reflect his role as a “humble petitioner”, Dimbleby (below) revealed.
He said: “He wanted to make sure that his clothes, for instance, made it possible for him initially to be what the role is, almost seeking the approval of the nation to become King, almost a humble petitioner, and then to emerge triumphant of this extraordinary pageant, of which he is the star.”
As King, Charles will focus on diversity and harmony in the country, leading as a “monarch for our times”, Dimbleby said.
“He sees his role, I think – I have talked about it with him – as being doing his best to achieve a sense of overarching harmony in a very diverse and often rather troubled, very troubled, often divided United Kingdom.
“That’s what will be his lodestar, his guiding sense of duty.”
Dimbleby added that Charles understands he can no longer share political views as King and in public will “only speak when he knows that he is expressing a consensus as defined by the government of the day”.
“He will honour the customs and he will be very much a monarch for our times because he is a 21st century person,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel