CAMPAIGNERS have demanded the UK Government gives the go-ahead to Scotland’s planned Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) to help deal with a “litter emergency”.
Supporters of the DRS spoke out ahead of a protest outside the UK Government’s main offices in Edinburgh at Queen Elizabeth House, where they turned up with cans and bottles they collected in a litter pick-up event.
David Spence of Fife Street Champions said: “We are in a ‘litter emergency’ and the Scottish and UK Governments must take the lead in doing everything they can to stem the tide of detritus that affects us all.”
It comes as the Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland (APRS) accused the UK Government of turning the scheme into a “political football”.
READ MORE: DRS: Circularity Scotland not informed in advance of delay
For DRS to go ahead in Scotland, ministers at Holyrood need to be granted an exemption from the UK Government’s Internal Market Act.
The lack of such an exemption was cited by the Scottish Government as a reason for the start date of the scheme being pushed back from August 16 this year to March 2024.
APRS, which has long campaigned for DRS, estimated that the latest delay will see almost half a billion extra bottles and cans littered, landfilled, or incinerated.
Dr Kat Jones, APRS director, said: “Every day this scheme is delayed, more and more cans and bottles are littered in our towns, countryside, and waterways.
“We have been waiting years for this scheme to be introduced, meanwhile the environmental cost is stacking up.
“We are in the midst of an environmental crisis, yet UK ministers are treating a basic recycling system as a political football.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel